Skip to content

Fix stream message handling in notebook kernel #1658

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

anandgupta42
Copy link
Contributor

@anandgupta42 anandgupta42 commented May 17, 2025

Summary

  • avoid early loop termination in Jupyter execution so all outputs are captured

Testing

  • python -m py_compile altimate_notebook_kernel.py

Important

Fixes premature loop termination in execute() of JupyterKernelExecutor to capture all outputs in altimate_notebook_kernel.py.

  • Behavior:
    • Fixes premature loop termination in execute() method of JupyterKernelExecutor in altimate_notebook_kernel.py.
    • Ensures all outputs are captured by removing break statements for stream, execute_result, display_data, and error message types.
  • Testing:
    • Syntax check performed using python -m py_compile altimate_notebook_kernel.py.

This description was created by Ellipsis for dc241bb. You can customize this summary. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved output handling to ensure all messages from code execution are collected and displayed, rather than only the first message.
  • Refactor

    • Enhanced message processing logic for better reliability and maintainability.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented May 17, 2025

Walkthrough

The message processing loop within the execute method of the JupyterKernelExecutor class was modified to remove early break statements. This allows the loop to accumulate multiple output messages per execution, continuing until a status message with execution_state set to idle is received or a timeout occurs. No public interfaces were changed.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
altimate_notebook_kernel.py Refactored the execute method to remove premature break statements, enabling collection of multiple output messages. Simplified message type checking for outputs. No changes to public interfaces.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Client
    participant JupyterKernelExecutor
    participant Kernel

    Client->>JupyterKernelExecutor: Request code execution
    JupyterKernelExecutor->>Kernel: Send execute request
    loop Until status: idle or timeout
        Kernel-->>JupyterKernelExecutor: Output message (stream, execute_result, display_data, error, etc.)
        JupyterKernelExecutor->>JupyterKernelExecutor: Accumulate message
    end
    Kernel-->>JupyterKernelExecutor: status: idle
    JupyterKernelExecutor->>Client: Return all accumulated output messages
Loading

Note

⚡️ AI Code Reviews for VS Code, Cursor, Windsurf

CodeRabbit now has a plugin for VS Code, Cursor and Windsurf. This brings AI code reviews directly in the code editor. Each commit is reviewed immediately, finding bugs before the PR is raised. Seamless context handoff to your AI code agent ensures that you can easily incorporate review feedback.
Learn more here.


Note

⚡️ Faster reviews with caching

CodeRabbit now supports caching for code and dependencies, helping speed up reviews. This means quicker feedback, reduced wait times, and a smoother review experience overall. Cached data is encrypted and stored securely. This feature will be automatically enabled for all accounts on May 16th. To opt out, configure Review - Disable Cache at either the organization or repository level. If you prefer to disable all data retention across your organization, simply turn off the Data Retention setting under your Organization Settings.
Enjoy the performance boost—your workflow just got faster.

Warning

Review ran into problems

🔥 Problems

Errors were encountered while retrieving linked issues.

Errors (1)
  • JIRA integration encountered authorization issues. Please disconnect and reconnect the integration in the CodeRabbit UI.

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f787955 and 357cd6f.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • altimate_notebook_kernel.py (2 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (5)
  • GitHub Check: test (windows-latest)
  • GitHub Check: build (windows-latest)
  • GitHub Check: test (ubuntu-latest)
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript-typescript)
  • GitHub Check: test (macos-latest)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
altimate_notebook_kernel.py (4)

69-72: Improved message capture: Removed early termination in stream handling.

The removal of the break statement after appending stream messages is a positive change. This allows the kernel executor to capture all output messages, including subsequent streams, rather than stopping after the first one. This fix aligns with the PR objective to prevent premature loop termination.


77-92: Improved message collection with better condition handling.

Two good improvements here:

  1. Using in ['execute_result', 'display_data'] instead of the or-condition makes the code more readable
  2. Removing the break after handling these messages ensures all output messages are collected

This change properly fulfills the PR objective of capturing all output messages during execution.


92-94: Improved error handling: Error messages no longer terminate the loop.

Removing the break statement after error handling allows the kernel to continue capturing subsequent output messages even after an error occurs. This is particularly helpful for handling partial executions or capturing diagnostic information that follows errors.


94-95: Appropriate loop termination condition retained.

Correctly maintaining the break condition for 'idle' status ensures the loop terminates only when execution is complete, not prematurely after the first output message. This, combined with the timeout fallback, creates a robust message collection mechanism.

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@Copilot Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR fixes premature loop termination in the Jupyter kernel executor to ensure that all outputs are captured during code execution.

  • Removed break statements for 'stream', 'execute_result', 'display_data', and 'error' message types to allow the loop to continue processing messages.
  • Refactored conditions for handling 'execute_result' and 'display_data' messages.
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (1)

altimate_notebook_kernel.py:71

  • Removing the break for 'stream' messages addresses premature termination, but consider verifying that an 'idle' status message will eventually be received to prevent a potential infinite loop under certain kernel conditions.
break

@@ -88,12 +87,10 @@ def datetime_converter(o):
other_keys_exist = True

# If no other keys exist, add the 'text/plain' value
if not other_keys_exist:
if not other_keys_exist and 'text/plain' in msg['content']['data']:
Copy link
Preview

Copilot AI May 17, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

[nitpick] It would be beneficial to add a brief comment explaining the rationale behind checking for 'text/plain' in msg['content']['data'] to clarify that this condition intentionally filters messages with solely plain text output.

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.

Copy link
Contributor

@ellipsis-dev ellipsis-dev bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Important

Looks good to me! 👍

Reviewed everything up to dc241bb in 1 minute and 17 seconds. Click for details.
  • Reviewed 46 lines of code in 1 files
  • Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
  • Skipped posting 5 draft comments. View those below.
  • Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.
1. altimate_notebook_kernel.py:69
  • Draft comment:
    Removed 'break' after handling stream messages. This change correctly prevents early termination so subsequent outputs are not missed.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful = 0% <= threshold 50% This comment is purely informative, praising the removal of a break statement. It doesn't provide any actionable feedback or suggestions for improvement.
2. altimate_notebook_kernel.py:77
  • Draft comment:
    Refactored condition for execute_result/display_data messages using the 'in' operator for better readability.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful = 0% <= threshold 50% This comment is purely informative and does not provide any actionable feedback or suggestions for improvement. It simply acknowledges a change that was made, which violates the rule against making purely informative comments.
3. altimate_notebook_kernel.py:90
  • Draft comment:
    Removed 'break' after appending execute_result/display_data output. This ensures that subsequent messages are captured as intended.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful = 0% <= threshold 50% This comment is purely informative, explaining the reason for removing a break statement. It does not provide a suggestion, ask for confirmation, or point out a potential issue. According to the rules, purely informative comments should be removed.
4. altimate_notebook_kernel.py:93
  • Draft comment:
    Removed 'break' in the error message block. Verify if continuing to process messages after an error is the intended behavior.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful = 0% <= threshold 50% The comment is asking the PR author to verify if the behavior is intended, which violates the rule against asking for confirmation of intention. It does not provide a specific suggestion or point out a clear issue with the code.
5. altimate_notebook_kernel.py:63
  • Draft comment:
    The 'datetime_converter' function is defined on every loop iteration but not used. Consider moving it outside the loop or removing it if unnecessary.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Comment was on unchanged code.

Workflow ID: wflow_vHFVMr7jN3D7L3GJ

You can customize Ellipsis by changing your verbosity settings, reacting with 👍 or 👎, replying to comments, or adding code review rules.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant