Skip to content

[CODEOWNERS] Fix linter errors #50951

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 30, 2025
Merged

[CODEOWNERS] Fix linter errors #50951

merged 1 commit into from
Jun 30, 2025

Conversation

jsquire
Copy link
Member

@jsquire jsquire commented Jun 28, 2025

Summary

The focus of these changes is to remove an owner who no longer meets the criteria due to changes in their account.

The focus of these changes is to remove an owner who no longer meets the criteria due to changes in their account.
@jsquire jsquire added this to the 2025-07 milestone Jun 28, 2025
@jsquire jsquire self-assigned this Jun 28, 2025
@Copilot Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings June 28, 2025 18:40
@jsquire jsquire added Client This issue is related to a non-management package EngSys This issue is impacting the engineering system. labels Jun 28, 2025
@jsquire jsquire requested a review from a team as a code owner June 28, 2025 18:40
Copy link
Contributor

@Copilot Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

Removes a user from the CODEOWNERS file now that they no longer meet ownership criteria.

  • Deleted @jlindamood from the owners list for the StorageSync SDK.

@jsquire jsquire merged commit dc1dab9 into main Jun 30, 2025
18 checks passed
@jsquire jsquire deleted the jsquire-patch-2 branch June 30, 2025 17:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Client This issue is related to a non-management package EngSys This issue is impacting the engineering system.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants