Skip to content

#355 Added menard equations 2.21 and 2.22 of CUR 228 #356

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 11 commits into from

Conversation

johan-tuls
Copy link
Contributor

@johan-tuls johan-tuls commented Oct 16, 2024

Description

Added Menard equations CUR 228

Please delete options that are not relevant.

  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • This change requires a documentation update

Checklist:

  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes

@johan-tuls johan-tuls linked an issue Oct 16, 2024 that may be closed by this pull request
2 tasks
Copy link

Thank you so much for contributing to Blueprints! This is your Pull Request # 2 to this project.
Your contributions help thousands of engineers work more efficiently and accurately.

Now that you've created your pull request, please don't go away; take a look at the bottom of this page for the automated checks that should already be running. If they pass, great! If not, please click on 'Details' and see if you can fix the problem they've identified. A maintainer should be along shortly to review your pull request and help get it added!

@johan-tuls johan-tuls requested a review from SZeltaat October 16, 2024 10:54
@johan-tuls johan-tuls changed the title #355 Added menard equations 2.21 and 2.22 of CUR 288 #355 Added menard equations 2.21 and 2.22 of CUR 228 Oct 16, 2024
Co-authored-by: PabloVasconez <pvascon@hotmail.com>
Copy link
Contributor

@rickdegoeij rickdegoeij left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

bit nitpicky sometimes, so feel free to interpret the comments :)

Comments that need address:

  • Latex equations don't match implementation
  • unittests for negative values
  • add negative value checks in 2.22
  • unittest for correctness of latex equations

Copy link
Member

@egarciamendez egarciamendez left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

check comments from @rickdegoeij

@johan-tuls johan-tuls dismissed rickdegoeij’s stale review March 5, 2025 12:00

I will let Enrique review as he is here today.

@GerjanDorgelo GerjanDorgelo requested review from GerjanDorgelo and removed request for egarciamendez, SZeltaat and rickdegoeij March 5, 2025 12:04
@johan-tuls
Copy link
Contributor Author

@GerjanDorgelo As the latex formula was also used in #522 please review the changes in that PR. All commented have been fixed.

@GerjanDorgelo
Copy link
Contributor

@GerjanDorgelo As the latex formula was also used in #522 please review the changes in that PR. All commented have been fixed.

@johan-tuls i dont see any updates. Any chance you forgot to sync the changes?

@GerjanDorgelo
Copy link
Contributor

i see this branch has been merged into #522. lets close this one then.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[✨ Feature request]: Menard stiffness cur 228
6 participants