Skip to content

Update README for chess.js example changes #175

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

anishgowda21
Copy link

@anishgowda21 anishgowda21 commented Dec 6, 2024

Summary

This PR updates the README to reflect changes in the example code:

  • Updated to use chess.js ^0.13.4.
  • Refactored example for better type safety and functionality.
  • Added TypeScript improvements in the example.

Notes

This change is documentation-only and does not impact functionality.

Copy link

vercel bot commented Dec 6, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
react-chessboard ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Dec 6, 2024 2:41pm

@anishgowda21 anishgowda21 changed the title Refactor: Update chess game logic with TypeScript improvements and en… Refactor: Update chess game logic with TypeScript improvements Dec 6, 2024
@anishgowda21 anishgowda21 changed the title Refactor: Update chess game logic with TypeScript improvements Update README for chess.js example changes Dec 6, 2024
@Clariity
Copy link
Owner

v5 is now ready for beta testing, please install the latest beta to give it a try:

pnpm i react-chessboard@beta

You will need to follow the upgrade guide

chess.js examples have been updated here in the new docs

@Clariity
Copy link
Owner

Clariity commented Jul 3, 2025

closing due to inactivity, please open a new PR if you find the issue within v5

@Clariity Clariity closed this Jul 3, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants