Skip to content

Conversation

1234-ad
Copy link

@1234-ad 1234-ad commented Oct 9, 2025

Description

This PR addresses issue #4731 by significantly improving test coverage for challengeHostTeamsCtrl.js from the current 70.51%.

Changes Made

Based on systematic analysis using Lumyst (Gemini 2.5 Pro Sequential Thinking), I identified and implemented the following missing test cases:

1. Untested Functions

  • ✅ Added comprehensive tests for activateCollapsible() function
  • ✅ Added detailed tests for load() function with success, error, and edge cases

2. Critical Edge Cases

  • ✅ Zero results pagination scenario (count: 0)
  • ✅ Initial load failure handling
  • ✅ HTTP error handling in load function
  • ✅ Null URL handling in load function

3. Enhanced Error Handling Tests

  • ✅ Specific error response parsing for different HTTP status codes
  • ✅ Error handling when retrieving updated lists fails
  • ✅ Error handling when refreshing team list after creation fails

4. Dialog Interaction Tests

  • ✅ Event propagation handling (stopPropagation)
  • ✅ Dialog cancellation scenarios
  • ✅ Invitation of existing team members
  • ✅ Comprehensive pagination state after deletion

5. Form Validation & State Management

  • ✅ Team object reset after successful operations
  • ✅ Error state management
  • ✅ Loader container assignment
  • ✅ Edge cases for storeChallengeHostTeamId with null/undefined values

How Lumyst Assisted

Lumyst (Gemini 2.5 Pro Sequential Thinking) was instrumental in this process:

  1. Systematic Code Analysis: Lumyst analyzed the controller code line-by-line to identify untested code paths
  2. Gap Identification: It categorized missing tests into 4 main areas: untested functions, edge cases, conditional branches, and user-flow scenarios
  3. Prioritization: Lumyst helped prioritize which test cases would have the most impact on coverage improvement
  4. Edge Case Discovery: It identified subtle scenarios like pagination state after deletion and error parsing that were previously missed

Test Coverage Improvements

  • Before: 70.51%
  • Added: 25+ new comprehensive test cases
  • Focus Areas: Error handling, edge cases, user interactions, state management

Files Changed

  • frontend/tests/controllers-test/challengeHostTeamsCtrl.test.js - Enhanced with comprehensive test coverage

Testing

All new tests follow the existing testing patterns and use proper mocking/spying techniques. The tests cover:

  • Success scenarios
  • Error scenarios
  • Edge cases
  • User interaction flows
  • State management

Suggestions for Lumyst Improvements

  1. Code Coverage Integration: Direct integration with coverage tools to show exact line-by-line gaps
  2. Test Generation: Ability to auto-generate test skeletons based on identified gaps
  3. Pattern Recognition: Better recognition of common testing patterns in the codebase
  4. Dependency Analysis: Understanding of complex dependency chains in large codebases

This PR significantly improves the robustness and reliability of the challengeHostTeamsCtrl tests while maintaining code quality standards.

- Add tests for activateCollapsible function
- Add tests for load function with success and error scenarios
- Add tests for zero results pagination edge case
- Add tests for initial load failure scenario
- Add tests for specific error response parsing
- Add tests for form validation edge cases
- Add tests for dialog cancellation scenarios
- Add comprehensive pagination state tests

This addresses the gaps identified to improve coverage from 70.51%
- Add tests for activateCollapsible function
- Add comprehensive tests for load function including error scenarios
- Add tests for edge cases in pagination logic
- Add tests for count-based scenarios (count = 0)
- Add tests for error handling in updateChallengeHostTeamData
- Add tests for HTTP response handling in load function
- Add tests for null URL handling in load function
- Add tests for loaderContainer initialization
- Improve overall test coverage to target >85%
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant