Skip to content

MCP Inspector integration #625

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Draft
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

MCP Inspector integration #625

wants to merge 2 commits into from
+1,464 −6

Conversation

aaronpowell
Copy link
Member

This is only designed to work with SSE transport type, as it will configure that through Aspire. If you want to use SSE, you can still launch it, but it will require some manual configuration in the inspector UI once started.

Currently it runs the inspector via npx, since there's no docker image available.

Closes #622

PR Checklist

  • Created a feature/dev branch in your fork (vs. submitting directly from a commit on main)
  • Based off latest main branch of toolkit
  • PR doesn't include merge commits (always rebase on top of our main, if needed)
  • New integration
    • Docs are written
    • Added description of major feature to project description for NuGet package (4000 total character limit, so don't push entire description over that)
  • Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes / features) (if applicable)
  • Contains NO breaking changes
  • Every new API (including internal ones) has full XML docs
  • Code follows all style conventions

Other information

@aaronpowell
Scaffolding out a MCP Inspector resource
e6ac8eb 
This is only designed to work with SSE transport type, as it will configure that through Aspire. If you want to use SSE, you can still launch it, but it will require some manual configuration in the inspector UI once started.

Currently it runs the inspector via `npx`, since there's no docker image available.

Fixes #622
@aaronpowell aaronpowell requested a review from Copilot April 8, 2025 02:54
Copilot
Copilot AI reviewed Apr 8, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@Copilot Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot reviewed 6 out of 14 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.

Files not reviewed (8)
  • Directory.Packages.props: Language not supported
  • examples/mcp-inspector/CommunityToolkit.Aspire.Hosting.McpInspector.AppHost/CommunityToolkit.Aspire.Hosting.McpInspector.AppHost.csproj: Language not supported
  • examples/mcp-inspector/CommunityToolkit.Aspire.Hosting.McpInspector.AppHost/Properties/launchSettings.json: Language not supported
  • examples/mcp-inspector/CommunityToolkit.Aspire.Hosting.McpInspector.AppHost/appsettings.json: Language not supported
  • examples/mcp-inspector/CommunityToolkit.Aspire.Hosting.McpInspector.McpServer/CommunityToolkit.Aspire.Hosting.McpInspector.McpServer.csproj: Language not supported
  • examples/mcp-inspector/CommunityToolkit.Aspire.Hosting.McpInspector.McpServer/Properties/launchSettings.json: Language not supported
  • examples/mcp-inspector/CommunityToolkit.Aspire.Hosting.McpInspector.McpServer/appsettings.json: Language not supported
  • src/CommunityToolkit.Aspire.Hosting.McpInspector/CommunityToolkit.Aspire.Hosting.McpInspector.csproj: Language not supported

@aaronpowell @davidfowl
Apply suggestions from code review
363abd7 
Co-authored-by: David Fowler <davidfowl@gmail.com>
@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Apr 8, 2025

Code Coverage

Package Line Rate Branch Rate Complexity Health
CommunityToolkit.Aspire.EventStore 100% 100% 46 ✔
CommunityToolkit.Aspire.GoFeatureFlag 100% 97% 74 ✔
CommunityToolkit.Aspire.Hosting.ActiveMQ 80% 40% 100 ✔
CommunityToolkit.Aspire.Hosting.ActiveMQ.MassTransit 1% 0% 14 ❌
CommunityToolkit.Aspire.Hosting.Azure.Dapr 67% 50% 828 ➖
CommunityToolkit.Aspire.Hosting.Azure.Dapr.Redis 97% 88% 36 ✔
CommunityToolkit.Aspire.Hosting.Azure.DataApiBuilder 100% 100% 22 ✔
CommunityToolkit.Aspire.Hosting.Azure.StaticWebApps 100% 100% 28 ✔
CommunityToolkit.Aspire.Hosting.Bun 82% 71% 54 ✔
CommunityToolkit.Aspire.Hosting.Dapr 63% 51% 724 ➖
CommunityToolkit.Aspire.Hosting.DbGate 96% 50% 18 ✔
CommunityToolkit.Aspire.Hosting.Deno 84% 75% 72 ✔
CommunityToolkit.Aspire.Hosting.EventStore 94% 100% 18 ✔
CommunityToolkit.Aspire.Hosting.GoFeatureFlag 93% 50% 18 ✔
CommunityToolkit.Aspire.Hosting.Golang 94% 50% 16 ✔
CommunityToolkit.Aspire.Hosting.Java 69% 72% 120 ➖
CommunityToolkit.Aspire.Hosting.k6 58% 12% 20 ❌
CommunityToolkit.Aspire.Hosting.LavinMQ 78% 50% 18 ➖
CommunityToolkit.Aspire.Hosting.LavinMQ.MassTransit 1% 0% 14 ❌
CommunityToolkit.Aspire.Hosting.MailPit 91% 50% 14 ✔
CommunityToolkit.Aspire.Hosting.Meilisearch 73% 57% 50 ➖
CommunityToolkit.Aspire.Hosting.MongoDB.Extensions 96% 83% 36 ✔
CommunityToolkit.Aspire.Hosting.Ngrok 52% 35% 82 ❌
CommunityToolkit.Aspire.Hosting.NodeJS.Extensions 90% 69% 96 ✔
CommunityToolkit.Aspire.Hosting.Ollama 67% 69% 162 ➖
CommunityToolkit.Aspire.Hosting.PapercutSmtp 92% 50% 10 ✔
CommunityToolkit.Aspire.Hosting.PostgreSQL.Extensions 100% 91% 44 ✔
CommunityToolkit.Aspire.Hosting.Python.Extensions 68% 55% 90 ➖
CommunityToolkit.Aspire.Hosting.RavenDB 63% 49% 136 ➖
CommunityToolkit.Aspire.Hosting.Redis.Extensions 100% 83% 36 ✔
CommunityToolkit.Aspire.Hosting.Rust 94% 83% 16 ✔
CommunityToolkit.Aspire.Hosting.SqlDatabaseProjects 74% 64% 114 ➖
CommunityToolkit.Aspire.Hosting.Sqlite 97% 91% 54 ✔
CommunityToolkit.Aspire.Hosting.SqlServer.Extensions 100% 83% 36 ✔
CommunityToolkit.Aspire.MassTransit.RabbitMQ 100% 100% 30 ✔
CommunityToolkit.Aspire.Meilisearch 97% 92% 68 ✔
CommunityToolkit.Aspire.Microsoft.Data.Sqlite 37% 27% 194 ❌
CommunityToolkit.Aspire.Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore.Sqlite 51% 50% 92 ❌
CommunityToolkit.Aspire.OllamaSharp 71% 64% 98 ➖
CommunityToolkit.Aspire.RavenDB.Client 60% 53% 237 ➖
Summary 71% (6173 / 8751) 57% (1891 / 3326) 3935 ➖

Minimum allowed line rate is 60%

@foxminchan foxminchan mentioned this pull request Apr 7, 2025
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@davidfowl davidfowl davidfowl left review comments

Copilot code review Copilot Copilot left review comments

At least 1 approving review is required to merge this pull request.

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

MCP Inspector
2 participants
@aaronpowell @davidfowl