Skip to content

split ci jobs by team workflows #5817

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 16 commits into from
Jun 6, 2025
Merged

split ci jobs by team workflows #5817

merged 16 commits into from
Jun 6, 2025

Conversation

rochdev
Copy link
Member

@rochdev rochdev commented Jun 3, 2025

What does this PR do?

Split CI jobs by team workflows.

Motivation

Conway's law.

Additional Notes

This should match roughly how the repo should be split up longer term, and it will also make it easier in the short-term to identify who owns any flaky tests.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jun 3, 2025

Overall package size

Self size: 9.59 MB
Deduped: 104.53 MB
No deduping: 105.05 MB

Dependency sizes | name | version | self size | total size | |------|---------|-----------|------------| | @datadog/libdatadog | 0.6.0 | 30.47 MB | 30.47 MB | | @datadog/native-appsec | 8.5.2 | 19.33 MB | 19.34 MB | | @datadog/pprof | 5.8.0 | 12.55 MB | 12.92 MB | | @datadog/native-iast-taint-tracking | 4.0.0 | 11.72 MB | 11.73 MB | | @opentelemetry/core | 1.30.1 | 908.66 kB | 7.16 MB | | protobufjs | 7.5.3 | 2.95 MB | 5.6 MB | | @datadog/wasm-js-rewriter | 4.0.1 | 2.85 MB | 3.58 MB | | @datadog/native-metrics | 3.1.1 | 1.02 MB | 1.43 MB | | @opentelemetry/api | 1.8.0 | 1.21 MB | 1.21 MB | | import-in-the-middle | 1.14.0 | 120.58 kB | 841.68 kB | | source-map | 0.7.4 | 226 kB | 226 kB | | opentracing | 0.14.7 | 194.81 kB | 194.81 kB | | lru-cache | 7.18.3 | 133.92 kB | 133.92 kB | | pprof-format | 2.1.0 | 111.69 kB | 111.69 kB | | @datadog/sketches-js | 2.1.1 | 109.9 kB | 109.9 kB | | lodash.sortby | 4.7.0 | 75.76 kB | 75.76 kB | | ignore | 5.3.2 | 53.63 kB | 53.63 kB | | istanbul-lib-coverage | 3.2.2 | 34.37 kB | 34.37 kB | | rfdc | 1.4.1 | 27.15 kB | 27.15 kB | | @isaacs/ttlcache | 1.4.1 | 25.2 kB | 25.2 kB | | dc-polyfill | 0.1.9 | 25.11 kB | 25.11 kB | | tlhunter-sorted-set | 0.1.0 | 24.94 kB | 24.94 kB | | shell-quote | 1.8.2 | 23.54 kB | 23.54 kB | | limiter | 1.1.5 | 23.17 kB | 23.17 kB | | retry | 0.13.1 | 18.85 kB | 18.85 kB | | semifies | 1.0.0 | 15.84 kB | 15.84 kB | | jest-docblock | 29.7.0 | 8.99 kB | 12.76 kB | | crypto-randomuuid | 1.0.0 | 11.18 kB | 11.18 kB | | ttl-set | 1.0.0 | 4.61 kB | 9.69 kB | | mutexify | 1.4.0 | 5.71 kB | 8.74 kB | | path-to-regexp | 0.1.12 | 6.6 kB | 6.6 kB | | koalas | 1.0.2 | 6.47 kB | 6.47 kB | | module-details-from-path | 1.0.4 | 3.96 kB | 3.96 kB |

🤖 This report was automatically generated by heaviest-objects-in-the-universe

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 3, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 80.70%. Comparing base (070a7d1) to head (a047334).
Report is 21 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #5817      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   79.15%   80.70%   +1.54%     
==========================================
  Files         522      466      -56     
  Lines       24030    19819    -4211     
==========================================
- Hits        19020    15994    -3026     
+ Misses       5010     3825    -1185     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@rochdev rochdev force-pushed the split-ci-by-team branch from a493f17 to 285ce50 Compare June 3, 2025 21:12
@pr-commenter
Copy link

pr-commenter bot commented Jun 3, 2025

Benchmarks

Benchmark execution time: 2025-06-05 14:38:15

Comparing candidate commit a047334 in PR branch split-ci-by-team with baseline commit 070a7d1 in branch master.

Found 0 performance improvements and 0 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 1268 metrics, 55 unstable metrics.

@datadog-datadog-prod-us1
Copy link

datadog-datadog-prod-us1 bot commented Jun 3, 2025

Datadog Report

Branch report: split-ci-by-team
Commit report: c2b643b
Test service: dd-trace-js-integration-tests

✅ 0 Failed, 1257 Passed, 0 Skipped, 20m 54.78s Total Time

@rochdev rochdev marked this pull request as ready for review June 3, 2025 22:29
@rochdev rochdev requested review from a team as code owners June 3, 2025 22:29
@rochdev rochdev requested a review from tonyredondo June 3, 2025 22:29
@rochdev rochdev marked this pull request as draft June 3, 2025 23:00
uses: actions/checkout@11bd71901bbe5b1630ceea73d27597364c9af683 # v4.2.2
- name: Check code meets quality and security standards
id: datadog-static-analysis
uses: DataDog/datadog-static-analyzer-github-action@v1

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🟠 Code Vulnerability

Workflow depends on a GitHub actions pinned by tag (...read more)

View in Datadog  Leave us feedback  Documentation

@rochdev rochdev marked this pull request as ready for review June 3, 2025 23:26
@rochdev rochdev requested a review from a team as a code owner June 3, 2025 23:26
Copy link
Collaborator

@watson watson left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The IGNORED_WORKFLOWS object in scripts/verify-ci-config.js should be updated according to the changes in this PR

@rochdev rochdev merged commit d9f0d7e into master Jun 6, 2025
510 checks passed
@rochdev rochdev deleted the split-ci-by-team branch June 6, 2025 12:18
ghost pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 6, 2025
@ghost ghost mentioned this pull request Jun 6, 2025
sabrenner pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 6, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants