-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14
Auto-activate java manifest tests #5511
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
dd-octo-sts
wants to merge
1
commit into
main
Choose a base branch
from
auto-java-manifest
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+9
−9
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The following baggage tests should not be enabled. They pass by chance, but as the comments say, the weblog applications are not configured properly to propagate HTTP Headers.
I see that this is auto-enabled. Is there a way to have an exclude list? This isn't the first time Baggage tests have been incorrectly enabled in a PR.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi @mhlidd,
It's a use case of negative assertion. The issue is not in the activation, but inside the : it test must not pass if it shouldn't. The reason is that, when the test will be activated, if for some unwanted reason, we broke the feature it in a way it get back to the state before its implementation, the test won't complain. So it's not achieving its goal.
We must add in those test an assertion that check the presence of something, either in the data sent by the tracer, or in the logs. Do you see any good candidate for that ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The issue here is with the
make_distant_call
of weblog applications not properly sending injected headers into the downstream request. Coincidentally, with malformed baggage headers, we expect no headers coming out in our assertions and the test will pass by chance. This explains why the malformed testsXPass
, but the basic test fails.We do have debug logs for the malformed header scenarios, but the log messages are Java specific. Do you think this is something worth including as an edge case for Java here? (We would have to include
DD_TRACE_DEBUG=true
as part of the env for this test scenario for this to work).