WBGT for CLM5

[jrbuzan]

Hello CLM5 Staff, Researchers, and Developers:

My article in JAMES was accepted recently where I implemented a physical representation of the Wet Bulb Globe Temperature into the non-urban environments of CLM5. The original code was an "all bells n' whistles" version update to the HumanIndexMod, and I am working to pair it down to a production code to hopefully be accepted by CLM5 developers.

The major advantage of implementation within CLM5 is capturing the explicit environments and comparing the various radiative environments that human laborers may be exposed to.

Overall, this is a substantial improvement to the HumanIndexMod—where radiation is ignored—and increases the capacity to CLM5.

Best regards,
-Jonathan R. Buzan
PhD
Climate and Environmental Physics
Physics Institute
Oeschger Centre for Climate Change Research
University of Bern
Sidlerstrasse 5
3012 Bern, Switzerland

[olyson]

Hi Jonathan, could you post a link to the JAMES article? Looking forward to seeing the code.

[wwieder]

Thanks for this update, Jonathan. Looking forward to hearing more from you and seeing how we can work to merge your updates into future model releases. Would it be helpful to meet and discuss what the most productive way to do this might be?

[jrbuzan]

Hello Keith and Will,

Thanks! I was looking for a journal preprint and didn't see it. But now the article is out:
https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2023MS003704

I was communicating with my current boss, Édouard Davin, and it is a possibility of going to NCAR to knock out two goals. 1) would be cleaning up my code for a production update. 2) Prof. Davin's group is interested in using CESM-VR for their land surface model experiments. My primary role would be setting up workflows to enable the use of CESM-VR.

Cheers,
-Jonathan

[wwieder]

Congratulations on the paper, Johathan It would be great to have you visit. Let us know dates you'd like to be here as your plans firms up. I have to admit I'm not very familiar with using the variable resolution model, but it could be worth reaching out to someone who is to see how much the configuration will change in the short term. I can't imagine very much, but there maybe changes that come in as we prepare for the CESM3 release, tentatively scheduled for this fall.

…

On Thu, Feb 8, 2024 at 11:57 PM Jonathan R Buzan ***@***.***> wrote: Hello Keith and Will, Thanks! I was looking for a journal preprint and didn't see it. But now the article is out: https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2023MS003704 I was communicating with my current boss, Édouard Davin, and it is a possibility of going to NCAR to knock out two goals. 1) would be cleaning up my code for a production update. 2) Prof. Davin's group is interested in using CESM-VR for their land surface model experiments. My primary role would be setting up workflows to enable the use of CESM-VR. Cheers, -Jonathan — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#2328 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AB5IWJCXY4YBNQ24Q2MUNFTYSXCENAVCNFSM6AAAAABCFQXSF2VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTSMZVGQZDENJVHE> . You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[ekluzek]

Pinging @jrbuzan and @olyson about this.

[ekluzek]

@olyson is this something that should come in? And do you have the changes for it?

[olyson]

I have not been in contact with @jrbuzan , so I'm unsure as to the status of this.