Skip to content

docs(lunar-lake): harden SLM258V-005 dense SLM receipt identity#4552

Merged
EffortlessSteven merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
codex/lunar-lake/SLM258V-005-receipt-identity
May 13, 2026
Merged

docs(lunar-lake): harden SLM258V-005 dense SLM receipt identity#4552
EffortlessSteven merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
codex/lunar-lake/SLM258V-005-receipt-identity

Conversation

@EffortlessSteven
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Summary

  • add top-level dense SLM receipt identity to answer-corpus and CPU phase warm-session receipts
  • refresh the committed Qwen2.5 258V CPU answer/phase receipts with explicit backend/runtime/fallback/model/template/kernel fields
  • add SLM258V-005 tracker state and generated dashboard rows

Claim boundary

This hardens dense SLM receipt identity only. It does not claim new dense SLM quality, CPU speed, Arc 140V execution, Intel NPU execution, acceleration, or BitNet QK256/I2_S behavior.

Verification

  • rustfmt --check --config skip_children=true --edition 2024 crates/bitnet-cli/src/commands/answer_corpus.rs crates/bitnet-cli/src/main.rs
  • cargo test --locked -p bitnet-cli --no-default-features --features cpu,full-cli --bin bitnet commands::answer_corpus::tests::slm_answer_aggregate_identity_uses_dense_cpu_lane -- --exact --nocapture
  • cargo test --locked -p bitnet-cli --no-default-features --features cpu,full-cli --bin bitnet receipt_identity -- --nocapture
  • python -m json.tool ci/hardware/intel-258v/2026-05-08/slm-answer-corpus-qwen25-cpu-clean-provenance.json
  • python -m json.tool ci/hardware/intel-258v/2026-05-08/slm-phase-warm-session-qwen25-cpu.json
  • python -m json.tool ci/hardware/intel-258v/2026-05-08/slm-phase-warm-session-qwen25-cpu-profiles/prefill_512.json
  • python -m json.tool ci/hardware/intel-258v/2026-05-08/slm-phase-warm-session-qwen25-cpu-profiles/decode_128.json
  • custom JSON audit for required top-level dense SLM identity fields
  • git diff --check

Known local limitation:

  • cargo run --locked -p xtask --no-default-features -- campaign generate --check: fails locally with Windows STATUS_STACK_OVERFLOW before completion
  • cargo run --locked -p xtask --no-default-features -- campaign doctor: fails locally with Windows STATUS_STACK_OVERFLOW before completion

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

You have reached your daily quota limit. Please wait up to 24 hours and I will start processing your requests again!

@chatgpt-codex-connector
Copy link
Copy Markdown

You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard.
To continue using code reviews, add credits to your account and enable them for code reviews in your settings.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown

coderabbitai Bot commented May 13, 2026

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@EffortlessSteven has exceeded the limit for the number of commits that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 9 minutes and 45 seconds before requesting another review.

You’ve run out of usage credits. Purchase more in the billing tab.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 73306c75-70c8-4b50-82f6-2a8f2697c8b3

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 22391a5 and 6849163.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (5)
  • docs/tracking/campaigns/intel-258v-platform/generated/status.md is excluded by !**/generated/**
  • docs/tracking/generated/active-prs.md is excluded by !**/generated/**
  • docs/tracking/generated/blocked-items.md is excluded by !**/generated/**
  • docs/tracking/generated/global-dashboard.md is excluded by !**/generated/**
  • docs/tracking/generated/lane-dashboard.md is excluded by !**/generated/**
📒 Files selected for processing (9)
  • ci/hardware/intel-258v/2026-05-08/slm-answer-corpus-qwen25-cpu-clean-provenance.json
  • ci/hardware/intel-258v/2026-05-08/slm-phase-warm-session-qwen25-cpu-profiles/decode_128.json
  • ci/hardware/intel-258v/2026-05-08/slm-phase-warm-session-qwen25-cpu-profiles/prefill_512.json
  • ci/hardware/intel-258v/2026-05-08/slm-phase-warm-session-qwen25-cpu.json
  • crates/bitnet-cli/src/commands/answer_corpus.rs
  • crates/bitnet-cli/src/main.rs
  • docs/tracking/campaigns/intel-258v-platform/CAMPAIGN.md
  • docs/tracking/campaigns/intel-258v-platform/active.toml
  • docs/tracking/campaigns/intel-258v-platform/events/2026-05-13T021313Z-SLM258V-005-pr-open.toml
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch codex/lunar-lake/SLM258V-005-receipt-identity

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@EffortlessSteven EffortlessSteven changed the title docs(lunar-lake): harden dense SLM receipt identity docs(lunar-lake): harden SLM258V-005 dense SLM receipt identity May 13, 2026
@EffortlessSteven EffortlessSteven merged commit 8fe66d4 into main May 13, 2026
69 of 70 checks passed
@EffortlessSteven EffortlessSteven deleted the codex/lunar-lake/SLM258V-005-receipt-identity branch May 13, 2026 02:47
EffortlessSteven added a commit that referenced this pull request May 13, 2026
Close out SLM258V-005 after dense Qwen SLM receipt identity hardening landed in #4552. Tracker-only change; no runtime or new platform claims.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant