Skip to content

Located resources

Located resources #872

Triggered via pull request November 12, 2025 22:20
@gebnergebner
synchronize #496
gebner_loc
Status Success
Total duration 20m 4s
Artifacts

ci.yml

on: pull_request
Fit to window
Zoom out
Zoom in

Annotations

10 warnings
ci: Pulse.Syntax.Base.fst#L289
(290) * Warning 290 at /__w/pulse/pulse/pulse/src/checker/Pulse.Syntax.Base.fst(289,14-289,16): - In the decreases clause for this function, the SMT solver may not be able to prove that the types of q1 (bound in Pulse.Syntax.Base.fst(289,14-289,16)) and t1 (bound in Pulse.Syntax.Base.fst(173,20-173,22)) are equal. - The type of the first term is: Pulse.Syntax.Base.qualifier - The type of the second term is: Pulse.Syntax.Base.st_term - If the proof fails, try annotating these with the same type.
ci: Pulse.Syntax.Base.fst#L123
(290) * Warning 290 at /__w/pulse/pulse/pulse/src/checker/Pulse.Syntax.Base.fst(123,20-123,22): - In the decreases clause for this function, the SMT solver may not be able to prove that the types of p1 (bound in Pulse.Syntax.Base.fst(123,20-123,22)) and pb1 (bound in Pulse.Syntax.Base.fst(139,16-139,19)) are equal. - The type of the first term is: Pulse.Syntax.Base.pattern - The type of the second term is: Pulse.Syntax.Base.pattern & Prims.bool - If the proof fails, try annotating these with the same type.
ci: Pulse.Syntax.Base.fst#L139
(290) * Warning 290 at /__w/pulse/pulse/pulse/src/checker/Pulse.Syntax.Base.fst(139,16-139,19): - In the decreases clause for this function, the SMT solver may not be able to prove that the types of pb1 (bound in Pulse.Syntax.Base.fst(139,16-139,19)) and p1 (bound in Pulse.Syntax.Base.fst(123,20-123,22)) are equal. - The type of the first term is: Pulse.Syntax.Base.pattern & Prims.bool - The type of the second term is: Pulse.Syntax.Base.pattern - If the proof fails, try annotating these with the same type.
ci: Pulse.Lib.Raise.fst#L21
(318) * Warning 318 at /__w/pulse/pulse/pulse/lib/common/Pulse.Lib.Raise.fst(21,4-21,12): - Values of type `raisable` will be erased during extraction, but its interface hides this fact. - Add the `must_erase_for_extraction` attribute to the `val raisable` declaration for this symbol in the interface
ci: PulseSyntaxExtension.Desugar.fst#L889
(328) * Warning 328 at /__w/pulse/pulse/pulse/src/syntax_extension/PulseSyntaxExtension.Desugar.fst(889,4-889,16): - Global binding 'PulseSyntaxExtension.Desugar.desugar_decl' is recursive but not used in its body
ci: Pulse.Common.fst#L84
(337) * Warning 337 at /__w/pulse/pulse/pulse/src/checker/Pulse.Common.fst(84,11-84,12): - The operator '@' has been resolved to FStar.List.Tot.append even though FStar.List.Tot is not in scope. Please add an 'open FStar.List.Tot' to stop relying on this deprecated, special treatment of '@'.
ci: PulseSyntaxExtension.Sugar.fst#L615
(337) * Warning 337 at /__w/pulse/pulse/pulse/src/syntax_extension/PulseSyntaxExtension.Sugar.fst(615,47-615,48): - The operator '@' has been resolved to FStar.List.Tot.append even though FStar.List.Tot is not in scope. Please add an 'open FStar.List.Tot' to stop relying on this deprecated, special treatment of '@'.
ci: PulseSyntaxExtension.Sugar.fst#L614
(337) * Warning 337 at /__w/pulse/pulse/pulse/src/syntax_extension/PulseSyntaxExtension.Sugar.fst(614,47-614,48): - The operator '@' has been resolved to FStar.List.Tot.append even though FStar.List.Tot is not in scope. Please add an 'open FStar.List.Tot' to stop relying on this deprecated, special treatment of '@'.
ci: PulseSyntaxExtension.Sugar.fst#L510
(328) * Warning 328 at /__w/pulse/pulse/pulse/src/syntax_extension/PulseSyntaxExtension.Sugar.fst(510,8-510,17): - Global binding 'PulseSyntaxExtension.Sugar.scan_decl' is recursive but not used in its body
ci: PulseSyntaxExtension.Sugar.fst#L370
(328) * Warning 328 at /__w/pulse/pulse/pulse/src/syntax_extension/PulseSyntaxExtension.Sugar.fst(370,8-370,15): - Global binding 'PulseSyntaxExtension.Sugar.eq_decl' is recursive but not used in its body