OWLWGTestCase: increase timeout from 10s to 60s #103
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Do you think it is better to get the PR from @cristianolongoodhl or yours ? |
|
I created this PR here, so that it can be merged already / independent of #99. I think reviewing the full #99 might need some more time and testing (and possibly cleanup of the git history), and also has some strategic element as part of the review: what Jena version to support / require as minimum. |
Locke
force-pushed
the
owlwgtest-timeout
branch
from
cefaec9 to
726a606
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Partially cherry-picked from 44202b0 at https://github.com/cristianolongoodhl/openllet-jena4.10/tree/jena4.8.0
I often encounter timeouts in the test case
WebOnt-description-logic-905.This has been authored by @cristianolongoodhl in #99, but is unrelated to the primary changes of that PR, so I think it is worth being applied separately.