Skip to content

[Breaking change] rename more() to something more explicit. #127

@Carreau

Description

@Carreau

See #124 and #126, the name more(), is confusing as it indicate that we want to keep iterating over buckets/records whatever even if they all will be empty. Maybe rename to something like more_with_zero_count, or more_empty ? Though this does not convey that all the subsequent one will be empty.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions