Tooling fixes #2323
Open
Tooling fixes #2323
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Build size and comparison to main:
|
|
Why does GCC14 matter when we are using a much older ARM cross compiler chain? Or is this an attempt to move the cross compile chain to a more recent version? |
|
Yeah exactly, this enables us to upgrade the compiler later. Also it's more semantically correct anyway, so it's a win-win |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
First commit fixes build for GCC 14
Second one adds nano specs to the compiler flags (needed as it sets compiler options) and uses nosys specs rather than linking manually. This made the group entries redundant also. Nice explanation of the spec files: https://metebalci.com/blog/demystifying-arm-gnu-toolchain-specs-nano-and-nosys/