|
| 1 | +## Title |
| 2 | + |
| 3 | +Culture Change through Hiring |
| 4 | + |
| 5 | +## Patlet |
| 6 | + |
| 7 | +TBD |
| 8 | + |
| 9 | +## Problem |
| 10 | + |
| 11 | +Getting any sort of ground swell behind an InnerSource project or program is hard when very few people in the company have experienced and internalized the InnerSource ways of working. |
| 12 | + |
| 13 | +While training existing staff is often part of an InnerSource program, it does take a long time to get to a critical mass of people with hands-own experience in InnerSource. |
| 14 | + |
| 15 | +The problem is made harder by a lack of collaboration between Engineering and the Recruitment team (HR), as InnerSource or Open Source skills aren't part of the interview process nor the personal development process of the employees. |
| 16 | + |
| 17 | +## Context |
| 18 | + |
| 19 | +> Where does the problem exist? What are the pre-conditions? **Unchangeable** before the solution goes into place. The content here is often tied to the applicability of the pattern for other readers: "Do I have this same particular situation?" |
| 20 | +
|
| 21 | +* Engineering and HR collaborate when hiring new engineers |
| 22 | +* Work done on InnerSource was not part of official performance review because HR was not on board. |
| 23 | +* some InnerSource projects are already happening but HR is not aware of those projects or considering the required InnerSource skills while recruiting. |
| 24 | + |
| 25 | +## Forces |
| 26 | + |
| 27 | +> What makes the problem difficult? What are the trade-offs? These are constraints that **can be changed** at a cost. The solution might change one or more of these forces in order to solve the problem, while also in-turn changing the context. |
| 28 | +
|
| 29 | +* InnerSource projects have a hard time finding employees who already know InnerSource or Open Source methodologies. |
| 30 | +* InnerSource as a concept is not well known |
| 31 | + |
| 32 | +## Solutions |
| 33 | + |
| 34 | +* Engineering and HR make a concerted effort to identify the skills that they want to recruit for in new employees and train the existing staff in |
| 35 | +* A handful of key-hires need to be identified, to act as evangelists for the InnerSource way of working |
| 36 | + |
| 37 | +## Resulting Context |
| 38 | + |
| 39 | +* InnerSource intentionally looped in during all HR interactions. |
| 40 | +* Engineering is looping in HR both in recruiting and retention phase of employee engagement. |
| 41 | + |
| 42 | +## Status |
| 43 | + |
| 44 | +Initial (Extracted from [this issue](https://github.com/InnerSourceCommons/InnerSourcePatterns/issues/37) and associated PR) |
| 45 | + |
| 46 | +## Appendix |
| 47 | + |
| 48 | +These are notes from the old pattern that we can work into the pattern structure above, if possible. Otherwise we will delete these when the PR gets merged. |
| 49 | + |
| 50 | +### Benefits |
| 51 | + |
| 52 | +* InnerSource can be a selling point for a company |
| 53 | +* InnerSource is going, but we are not intentionally leveraging in HR strategy. |
| 54 | +* 10% time is not taken up and used; sometimes culture is only taken up by hiring the right people |
| 55 | + |
| 56 | +### Notes |
| 57 | + |
| 58 | +* Ramping up InnerSource; semi-existent |
| 59 | +* On-boarding guidelines |
| 60 | +* HR is affected by InnerSource |
| 61 | + * Problem: How to sustain the InnerSource culture, even once new hires come in. How to keep existing employees who support and encourage InnerSource? Filling the ranks with new InnerSource-friendly and InnerSource-excited hires can be difficult. |
| 62 | +* Company perception is drab and boring engineering culture; large company |
| 63 | + * Company is not attractive, or people are leaving, or hiring is difficult. |
| 64 | + * Company has trouble attracting developers who are interested in open source and InnerSource. |
| 65 | +* Keep everyone updated on how the communities work, both from culture and technology perspective. |
0 commit comments