[FEAT] Domain architecture analyses #22
Replies: 1 comment
-
That spot seems to be correct. As shown here, 04a (ipr) and 04b (rps) were meant to be alternate ways of going about prot2da. There's a good amount of overlap, but there are also rps/cdd-specific vs. ipr-specific analyses. In this case, we could potentially integrate the best of both worlds. I know @d33bs and @epbrenner were looking into hmmer as well. These will all help us go from prot2da (proteins to domains/domain_architectures). No temp files from rps yet since 04b was never really used to generate these files. Once we run that (w/ Currently, it's towards the end of full analysis for homologs (i.e., does not run for queries): https://github.com/JRaviLab/molevol_scripts/blob/main/upstream_scripts/00_wrapper_full.sb#L152-L155 cc: @the-mayer |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Clean implementation of RPSBLAST w/ our existing DA analyses
rps analysis
rpsblast
using CDDrps2da
rps2viz
Alternatives
functionality and final implementation should be similar to
RPSBLAST
signalp
| manualtmhmm
| manualBeta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions