Skip to content

Conversation

vtjnash
Copy link
Contributor

@vtjnash vtjnash commented Mar 14, 2025

Similar to bugfix in #99

Copy link
Member

@rafaqz rafaqz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, I think it was only like this because constructorof also followed this pattern of using parentmodule and nameof rather than .wrapper.

There may have been some concerns about using internals.

@aplavin aplavin mentioned this pull request Mar 15, 2025
@aplavin
Copy link
Member

aplavin commented Mar 15, 2025

Could you please rebase on master? CI was cleaned up there to avoid almost all spurious test failures.

@nsajko
Copy link
Contributor

nsajko commented Jun 9, 2025

can be closed now, the changes are merged with #104

@aplavin aplavin closed this Jun 9, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants