Skip to content

Conversation

steffi7574
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@steffi7574 steffi7574 requested a review from tdrwenski June 21, 2025 01:49
Copy link
Collaborator

@tdrwenski tdrwenski left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me, just a couple minor comments. Is it worth adding a test case with a hamiltonian file?

@tdrwenski
Copy link
Collaborator

Looks good to me! Possibly the test expected results or input matrix needs to be updated though as it looks like the results are slightly different than expected, could it be related to the switching the order of matrix A and B?

Previously, the hamiltonian-reader regression test used a random
initialization of the control parameters, which, apparently, is
different when running on different machines. This changes the
configuration for this test to use constant control parameters, to
produce the same output on all machines.
@steffi7574 steffi7574 merged commit 4e539a4 into main Jun 25, 2025
10 checks passed
@steffi7574 steffi7574 deleted the read-sparse-hamiltonian branch June 25, 2025 17:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants