Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
61 lines (48 loc) · 1.08 KB

File metadata and controls

61 lines (48 loc) · 1.08 KB

Example: Greenfield CLI Tool

Scenario

You are starting a new CLI utility from scratch inside a clean repository.

Example outcome:

  • parse input;
  • perform one core action well;
  • ship a minimal but documented first version.

Recommended Path

/wf.discover
/wf.spike
/wf.arch
/wf.spec
/wf.plan
/wf.tasks
/wf.tooling
/wf.dispatch
/wf.implement
/wf.review
/wf.finish-branch
/wf.project-report
/wf.human-qa
/wf.debug
/wf.finish-report

Why This Path

  • Greenfield work benefits from the full stage sequence.
  • Early architecture/spec work reduces downstream thrash.
  • Dispatch + implement split keeps the execution deterministic.

Key Artifacts

  • discovery notes and problem framing;
  • architecture decision summary;
  • specification with accepted scope;
  • implementation plan;
  • task passports;
  • tooling constraints;
  • review notes and final report.

HR Checkpoints

Strongly recommended approvals:

  • /wf.arch
  • /wf.spec
  • /wf.plan
  • /wf.tasks
  • /wf.tooling

Good Fit

  • New repositories
  • First version of a feature
  • MVPs with non-trivial workflow or tool design