Skip to content

Conversation

JMEdwardsXtr
Copy link
Contributor

This branch follows #1456 in implementing the changes cleanly from a more recent version of CSET.

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Aug 4, 2025

Coverage

@jfrost-mo jfrost-mo changed the title CSET_Obs_JME_310725 Ingestion of synoptic observations Aug 6, 2025
@jfrost-mo jfrost-mo force-pushed the CSET_Obs_JME_310725 branch from c820209 to f5cb2ec Compare August 18, 2025 12:51
Copy link
Member

@jfrost-mo jfrost-mo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry this took so long to review.

It looks like a good approach. I've got a few questions and suggestions that I've left as comments, both nothing that should be too arduous.

I've also reviewed https://github.com/MetOffice/CSET-workflow/pull/199 and aside from needing a path updated it is also good to go. I suggest it is merged at the same time as this one.

Copy link
Contributor

@daflack daflack left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

From a science perspective the only thing is adding a little bit more to the descriptions in the recipes following @jfrost-mo's comments. Also worth adding in a few tests.

@JMEdwardsXtr
Copy link
Contributor Author

Reviewing changes have been implemented. We should think about the general policy on testing observational code, since that may involve running code in the restricted repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants