-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7
Ingestion of synoptic observations #1579
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
c820209
to
f5cb2ec
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sorry this took so long to review.
It looks like a good approach. I've got a few questions and suggestions that I've left as comments, both nothing that should be too arduous.
I've also reviewed https://github.com/MetOffice/CSET-workflow/pull/199 and aside from needing a path updated it is also good to go. I suggest it is merged at the same time as this one.
src/CSET/cset_workflow/includes/spatial_surface_model_obs_diference.cylc
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/CSET/cset_workflow/includes/spatial_surface_model_obs_diference.cylc
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
From a science perspective the only thing is adding a little bit more to the descriptions in the recipes following @jfrost-mo's comments. Also worth adding in a few tests.
Reviewing changes have been implemented. We should think about the general policy on testing observational code, since that may involve running code in the restricted repository. |
This branch follows #1456 in implementing the changes cleanly from a more recent version of CSET.