Skip to content

Conversation

jpuri
Copy link
Contributor

@jpuri jpuri commented Sep 4, 2024

No description provided.

@jpuri jpuri requested a review from a team as a code owner September 4, 2024 17:42
@Gudahtt Gudahtt changed the title 14.1.0 14.0.1 Sep 4, 2024

## [14.0.1]
### Fixed
- Request validation should not throw if verifyingContract is not defined in typed signature ([#328](https://github.com/MetaMask/eth-json-rpc-middleware/pull/328))
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nit: Is this a better description? The field is in the message, not the message type or the signature for the message.

Suggested change
- Request validation should not throw if verifyingContract is not defined in typed signature ([#328](https://github.com/MetaMask/eth-json-rpc-middleware/pull/328))
- Request validation should not throw if verifyingContract is not defined in typed message ([#328](https://github.com/MetaMask/eth-json-rpc-middleware/pull/328))

Copy link
Member

@Gudahtt Gudahtt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM! One suggested improvement to the wording

Copy link
Member

@Gudahtt Gudahtt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

One changelog lint error to fix

@jpuri jpuri merged commit 7bce6e8 into 14.x Sep 4, 2024
15 checks passed
@jpuri jpuri deleted the release/14.1.0 branch September 4, 2024 17:55
@Gudahtt
Copy link
Member

Gudahtt commented Sep 4, 2024

A new version of the package @metamask/eth-json-rpc-middleware (14.0.1) was published at 2024-09-04T17:57:41.163Z from [redacted].
The shasum of this package is 0129e5823cc219f5474e7f766dc9c9bbe2eb82a3.

Gudahtt added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 4, 2024
* 14.x:
  14.0.1 (#331)
  Request validation should not throw if verifyingContract is not defined in typed signature (#328) (#330)
Gudahtt added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 6, 2024
* Request validation should not throw if verifyingContract is not defined in typed signature (#328) (#330)

* 14.0.1 (#331)

---------

Co-authored-by: Jyoti Puri <jyotipuri@gmail.com>
Gudahtt added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 2, 2024
* Request validation should not throw if verifyingContract is not defined in typed signature (#328) (#330)

* 14.0.1 (#331)

* [14.x] fix: support ethermint's EIP712 implementation (#333)

* setting cosmos as allowed string for verifyingContract field

* fixed and linter

* readability

* Update condition to match main branch

* Remove duplicate copy of test

---------

Co-authored-by: Jyoti Puri <jyotipuri@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Mark Stacey <markjstacey@gmail.com>

* Version 14.0.2 (#339)

* Version 14.0.2

* Fix typo

Co-authored-by: Michele Esposito <34438276+mikesposito@users.noreply.github.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Michele Esposito <34438276+mikesposito@users.noreply.github.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Jyoti Puri <jyotipuri@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Michael Tsitrin <114929630+mtsitrin@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Michele Esposito <34438276+mikesposito@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants