Skip to content

Conversation

austinabell
Copy link

@austinabell austinabell commented May 9, 2023

I mainly just did this to verify another implementation against this to make sure it matched up, but I figured I'd PR in for the case that you share the opinion that having a shared test suite for different clients is valuable. Feel free to just close this PR if not interested.

If open to this, let me know if this runner is set up how you'd like, and also if you'd want to transfer ownership of the test vector repo (I don't care to have it under my domain if you'd prefer).

Block test vectors are a bit slow, if you want to consider not having this run with the normal test suite. Approval message signature validation was prohibitively slow, so I just skipped that validation in the runner.

Link to test vector repo for convenience https://github.com/austinabell/near-light-client-tests

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants