Skip to content

Conversation

jlucovsky
Copy link
Contributor

2 new test cases

  • bytemath-07 Test 05 for release 8 and later
  • bytemath-08 Using additional "lol" signature

Issue: 1412

Ticket

If your pull request is related to a Suricata ticket, please provide
the full URL to the ticket here so this pull request can monitor
changes to the ticket status:

Redmine ticket:

@jlucovsky jlucovsky added the requires suricata fix This PR requires an issue in Suricata to be fixed first label Jun 17, 2025
@catenacyber
Copy link
Collaborator

additional "lol" signature

Wonder where it comes from :-p

@catenacyber catenacyber added requires suricata pr Depends on a PR in Suricata and removed requires suricata fix This PR requires an issue in Suricata to be fixed first labels Jun 18, 2025
@catenacyber catenacyber added the decision-required Waiting on deliberation from the team label Jun 25, 2025
@jlucovsky jlucovsky force-pushed the 1412/1 branch 2 times, most recently from c950a72 to e58a07a Compare June 28, 2025 13:33
@catenacyber catenacyber removed the decision-required Waiting on deliberation from the team label Jul 2, 2025
Copy link
Collaborator

@catenacyber catenacyber left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

See decision in OISF/suricata#13516 (review) :

needs a warning, and only an error when in "strict" mode

So we need tests for these 2 modes

@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
requires:
min-version: 8
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Only the shell check requires min-version 8, right ?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, correct.


requires:
min-version: 7
version: 7
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we really need this change ?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No; i'll revert.

@catenacyber
Copy link
Collaborator

Is this PR up to date wrt the latest desiderata for the suricata PR ?

count: 1
match:
event_type: alert
alert.signature_id: 44412999
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would like a README, or a comment here ;-)

Add/modify test cases to use the `rule-strict-keywords` where
appropriate.

2 new test cases
- bytemath-07 Test 05 for release 8 and later
- bytemath-08 Using additional "lol" signature
- bytemath-09 Using additional "lol" signature

Issue: 1412
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
requires suricata pr Depends on a PR in Suricata
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants