Update urls.py

[DonnieBLT]

PR Type

enhancement

---

Description

• Commented out the invite URL pattern in urls.py.

• Disabled the InviteCreate view for the invite endpoint.

---

Changes walkthrough 📝

	Relevant files
Enhancement	urls.py Commented out the `invite` URL pattern                                      blt/urls.py Commented out the invite URL pattern. Disabled the InviteCreate view for the invite endpoint. +1/-1

---

Need help?

Type /help how to ... in the comments thread for any questions about PR-Agent usage.

Check out the documentation for more information.

[github-actions]

PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

Here are some key observations to aid the review process:

⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 1 🔵⚪⚪⚪⚪

🧪 No relevant tests

🔒 No security concerns identified

⚡ Recommended focus areas for review Disabled Functionality The invite URL pattern and its associated InviteCreate view have been commented out. Ensure this change aligns with the intended functionality and does not disrupt dependent features or workflows. #re_path(r"^invite/$", InviteCreate.as_view(template_name="invite.html"), name="invite"),

[github-actions]

PR Code Suggestions ✨

Explore these optional code suggestions:

Category	Suggestion	Impact
General	Restore or document the commented route Avoid commenting out the re_path for the "invite" endpoint unless it is no longer needed, as this could unintentionally break functionality or confuse future developers. If it is deprecated, consider removing it entirely or documenting the reason for its removal. blt/urls.py [574] -#re_path(r"^invite/$", InviteCreate.as_view(template_name="invite.html"), name="invite"), +re_path(r"^invite/$", InviteCreate.as_view(template_name="invite.html"), name="invite"), Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7 __ Why: The suggestion addresses a potential issue where commenting out the route could lead to confusion or unintended functionality loss. Restoring or documenting the reason for its removal improves maintainability and clarity for future developers.	Medium