|
| 1 | +# Crosswalk between openEO API and OGC API - Processes |
| 2 | + |
| 3 | +This document gives a brief overview over similarities and differences between |
| 4 | +- **openEO API, v1.2.0** |
| 5 | +- **OGC API - Processes - Part 1: Core, v1.0.0** |
| 6 | + |
| 7 | +In the following I use **OAP1** as an abbreviation for **OGC API - Processes - Part 1**. |
| 8 | + |
| 9 | +## General |
| 10 | + |
| 11 | +OCG API - Processes defines just processing, while the openEO API has a much broader scope. |
| 12 | +openEO covers many parts that other OGC API specifications define, some are aligned some are not. |
| 13 | + |
| 14 | +The openEO API covers the following "categories" of endpoints: |
| 15 | +- [API discovery](#api-discovery) - partially covered by OGC API - Processes - Part 1 |
| 16 | +- [Authentication](#authentication) - not defined by OGC |
| 17 | +- [Data Discovery](#data-discovery) - covered by various other OGC APIs (Coverages, EDR, Features, Records, ...) |
| 18 | +- [Process Discovery](#process-discovery) - covered by OGC API - Processes - Part 1 |
| 19 | + - [Pre-defined processes](#pre-defined-processes) - covered by OGC API - Processes - Part 1 |
| 20 | + - [User-defined processes](#user-defined-processes) - covered by OGC API - Processes - Part 2 and 3 |
| 21 | +- [Data Processing](#data-processing) - covered by OGC API - Processes - Part 1 and 3 |
| 22 | + - [Synchronous processing](#synchronous-processing) - covered by OGC API - Processes - Part 1 |
| 23 | + - [Batch Job processing](#batch-job-processing) - covered by OGC API - Processes - Part 1 |
| 24 | + - [On-demand processing](#on-demand-processing) - covered by other OGC APIs (Maps, Tiles, ...) |
| 25 | +- [File Storage](#file-storage) - not covered by OGC APIs |
| 26 | + |
| 27 | +Both APIs use HTTP as the basis and encourage HTTPS. |
| 28 | +HTTP 1.1 is required for OAP1, while openEO doesn't specify a specific HTTP version. |
| 29 | +The APIs follow REST principles and make use of HTTP content negotiation. |
| 30 | +The APIs make broad use of "Web Linking" (compatible between OAP1 and openEO). |
| 31 | +Both specifications recommend the implementation of CORS. |
| 32 | + |
| 33 | +The default encoding for requests and response bodies is JSON. OGC API recommends to also support |
| 34 | +HTML as an response body encoding. openEO uses client software to render HTML output from JSON. |
| 35 | + |
| 36 | +Both specifications make broad use of OpenAPI 3.0 and JSON Schema for specification purposes. |
| 37 | + |
| 38 | +Many API endpoints in OAP1 and openEO support pagination through links with the relation types `next` |
| 39 | +and `prev`. These endpoints have a `limit` parameter to enable pagination for a specific page size. |
| 40 | +**Note:** Pagination is rarely used in openEO implementations and most clients don't support it consistently. |
| 41 | + |
| 42 | +## API discovery |
| 43 | + |
| 44 | +Discovering the API, connecting to it and reading the capabilities is always the first step clients |
| 45 | +need to execute. |
| 46 | + |
| 47 | +### Well-known document |
| 48 | + |
| 49 | +- openEO: `GET /.well-known/openeo` |
| 50 | +- OAP1: n/a |
| 51 | + |
| 52 | +openEO clients usually connect to the well-known document first to discover different versions or |
| 53 | +implementations of a server. Thus a client can choose a suitable API versions inclusing choosing |
| 54 | +between production and development instances. Then the openEO client connects to the selected |
| 55 | +instance's [landing page](#landing-page), which OGC API - Processes clients always directly connect |
| 56 | +to. openEO clients can usually also directly connect to the landing page though. |
| 57 | + |
| 58 | +This folder structure with the document resides usually outside of the actual API implementations, |
| 59 | +i.e. in the root of the host or domain. |
| 60 | + |
| 61 | +### Landing page |
| 62 | + |
| 63 | +- openEO: `GET /` (required) |
| 64 | +- OAP1: `GET /` (required) |
| 65 | + |
| 66 | +As the landing pages both are based on top of OGC API - Common, they are very similar. |
| 67 | + |
| 68 | +Some differences include: |
| 69 | +- openEO requires the following additional fields: |
| 70 | + - Defined in OAP1, but not required: `title`, `description` |
| 71 | + - Not defined in OAP1: `api_version`, `backend_version`, `stac_version`, `id`, `endpoints`, (`type`) |
| 72 | +- The relation type to link to the conformance classes is `conformance` in openEO (originating from |
| 73 | + OGC API - Features / STAC API) and `http://www.opengis.net/def/rel/ogc/1.0/conformance` in OAP1. |
| 74 | + Two links with the same target but different relation types will be required. |
| 75 | +- The existance of API endpoints in openEO is primarily checked through `endpoints`, which is |
| 76 | + not present in OAP1. OAP1 uses links, which openEO primarily uses for non-API-related links. |
| 77 | + Nevertheless, links such as required in OAP1 can be added easily to an openEO implementation. |
| 78 | + The following additionl links are relevant for OAP1: |
| 79 | + - One of the link relations `service-desc` or `service-doc` is required in OAP1. They should link |
| 80 | + to an API description (e.g. OpenAPI or rendered HTML version). |
| 81 | + - A link with relation type `http://www.opengis.net/def/rel/ogc/1.0/processes` to `/processes` is |
| 82 | + required for OAP1, but not in openEO. |
| 83 | + - A link with relation type `http://www.opengis.net/def/rel/ogc/1.0/job-list` to `/jobs` can be |
| 84 | + added in OAP1, but is not present in openEO. |
| 85 | + |
| 86 | +### Conformanc classes |
| 87 | + |
| 88 | +- openEO: `GET /conformance` (optional) |
| 89 | +- OAP1: `GET /conformance` (required) |
| 90 | + |
| 91 | +Both endpoints are 100% equivalent. |
| 92 | +OAP1 requires a separate endpoint that lists conformance classes. |
| 93 | +openEO additionally allows to list the conformance classes in the landing page (follows STAC API). |
| 94 | +Conformance classes are only fully defined since openEO API v1.2.0. |
| 95 | + |
| 96 | +## Authentication |
| 97 | + |
| 98 | +- openEO: `GET /credentials/basic` and/or `GET /credentials/oidc` |
| 99 | +- OAP1: n/a |
| 100 | + |
| 101 | +OpenEO defines two authentication mechanisms: |
| 102 | +- OpenID Connect (primary) |
| 103 | +- HTTP Basic (secondary, primarily for development/testing purposes) |
| 104 | + |
| 105 | +OAP1 doesn't define any authentication machanisms, but both authentication mechanisms can also be |
| 106 | +implemented for OAP1. The main issue will be that OAP1 clients will likely not support them. |
| 107 | + |
| 108 | +The availability of the authentication mechanisms is detected through the `endpoints` in the |
| 109 | +[landing page](#landing-page) in openEO, while in OAP1 you need to parse the OpenAPI document for it |
| 110 | +(which implicitly requires a link to an OpenAPI 3.0 file with relation type `service-desc` in the |
| 111 | +landing page). |
| 112 | + |
| 113 | +## Data Discovery |
| 114 | + |
| 115 | +Data Discovery is not covered by OAP1, but it can be "plugged in" through various other OGC APIs |
| 116 | +(e.g. Coverages, EDR, Features, Records, ...). Except for OGC API - Processes - Part 3, it is not |
| 117 | +clear how the processes defined in OAP1 can access resources from the other APIs. The processes |
| 118 | +probably need to implement data access individually through OGC API clients. As such, OAP1 could |
| 119 | +also be made compliant with STAC API - Collection and STAC API - Features. STAC API - Collections |
| 120 | +is required by openEO, STAC API - Features is optional in openEO, but would likely be required to |
| 121 | +allow data access through OAP1 processes. |
| 122 | + |
| 123 | +## Process Discovery |
| 124 | + |
| 125 | +The OAP1 specification claims that it |
| 126 | +> does not mandate the use of any specific process description to specify the interface of a |
| 127 | +process. |
| 128 | + |
| 129 | +It defines a "default" encoding in the conformance class "OGC Process Description" though. |
| 130 | +Unfortunately, this is [a somewhat miselading statement](https://github.com/opengeospatial/ogcapi-processes/issues/325) |
| 131 | +and OAP1 still provides a predefined set of fields which conflict with openEO (see below). |
| 132 | + |
| 133 | +The openEO API specifies a single encoding for process descriptions. |
| 134 | + |
| 135 | +An important difference is that in OAP1 you usually execute just one process |
| 136 | +(you can optionally chain them using OGC API - Processes - Part 3). |
| 137 | +This means a process in OAP1 are usually more complex. |
| 138 | +In openEO a process is usually very fine-granular (e.g. addition of two numbers) |
| 139 | +and you usually chain multiple of them to a more complex process (graph). |
| 140 | + |
| 141 | +### Pre-defined processes |
| 142 | + |
| 143 | +- openEO: `GET /processes` (required) |
| 144 | +- OAP1: `GET /processes`, `GET /processes/{processID}` (both required) |
| 145 | + |
| 146 | +In openEO `GET /processes` returns the full process metadata, while in OAP1 it only returns a summary. |
| 147 | +The general structure of the response of `GET /processes` is the same (`processes` and `links`). |
| 148 | +The OGC Process Description and the openEO process description are not compatible though. |
| 149 | + |
| 150 | +openEO doesn't define an endpoint yet to retrieve an indivdual process such as |
| 151 | +`GET /processes/{processID}` in OAP1. |
| 152 | +There is a [proposal](https://github.com/Open-EO/openeo-api/pull/348) available to add such an endpoint. |
| 153 | +openEO has the concept of namespace for processes though and thus defines the endpoint at |
| 154 | +`GET /processes/{namespace}/{process}` which would conflict with OAP1. |
| 155 | + |
| 156 | +Some notable differences in the process description (only fully delivered via `GET /processes/{processID}`): |
| 157 | +- OAP1 defines `jobControlOptions`, which is |
| 158 | + [undefined in openEO](https://github.com/Open-EO/openeo-api/issues/429) yet |
| 159 | + (which implies `["sync-execute","async-execute"]`). |
| 160 | +- OAP1 defines `outputTransmission`, which is not available in openEO. |
| 161 | + It seems though [this will be removed](https://github.com/opengeospatial/ogcapi-processes/issues/326). |
| 162 | +- OAP1 allows multiple outputs, openEO only allows a single output |
| 163 | + (potential workaround: wrap in an array or object) |
| 164 | +- OAP1 uses `title` and openEO uses `summary` |
| 165 | +- OAP1 specifies `inputs` as object and the identifier as key, |
| 166 | + openEO specifies `parameters` as array and the identifier as `name` property |
| 167 | + (but the content of each of them is otherwise very similar). |
| 168 | + |
| 169 | +Below is a simple process encoded in the two variants discussed here: |
| 170 | +- [OGC Process Description](oap-echo-example.json) |
| 171 | +- [openEO Process](openeo-echo-example.json) |
| 172 | + |
| 173 | +### User-defined processes |
| 174 | + |
| 175 | + TBD, lower priority as it's not covered by OAP1. |
| 176 | + Instead it is defined in OGC API - Processes - Part 2. |
| 177 | + |
| 178 | +## Data Processing |
| 179 | + |
| 180 | +### Synchronous processing |
| 181 | + |
| 182 | +- openEO: `POST /result` |
| 183 | +- OAP1: `POST /processes/{processID}/execution` |
| 184 | + |
| 185 | +TBD |
| 186 | + |
| 187 | +### Batch Job processing |
| 188 | + |
| 189 | +#### Job list |
| 190 | + |
| 191 | +- openEO: `GET /jobs` |
| 192 | +- OAP1: `GET /jobs` |
| 193 | + |
| 194 | +TBD |
| 195 | + |
| 196 | +#### Job status |
| 197 | + |
| 198 | +- openEO: `GET /jobs/{jobID}` |
| 199 | +- OAP1: `GET /jobs/{jobID}` |
| 200 | + |
| 201 | +TBD |
| 202 | + |
| 203 | +#### Creating a job |
| 204 | +- openEO: `POST /jobs` |
| 205 | +- OAP1: `POST /processes/{processID}/execution` |
| 206 | + |
| 207 | +In OAP you may provide inputs, outputs, the response type (raw or document) and/or a subscriber. |
| 208 | + |
| 209 | +In openEO you must provide a process (chained processes as process graph with optional additional metadata) |
| 210 | +and you may additionally provide a title, a description, a billing plan and/or a maximum budget. |
| 211 | + |
| 212 | +Both specifications seem to allow providing additional properties. |
| 213 | + |
| 214 | +#### Queueing a job |
| 215 | + |
| 216 | +- openEO: `POST /jobs/{jobID}/results` |
| 217 | +- OAP1: n/a (queued directly after creation) |
| 218 | + |
| 219 | +#### Result Access |
| 220 | + |
| 221 | +- openEO: `GET /jobs/{jobID}/results` |
| 222 | +- OAP1: `GET /jobs/{jobID}/results` |
| 223 | + |
| 224 | +In openEO result access does fully rely on STAC. The response is a valid STAC Item or Collection. |
| 225 | + |
| 226 | +In OAP1 the result access [differs depending on the given parameters](https://docs.ogc.org/is/18-062r2/18-062r2.html#toc34). |
| 227 | + |
| 228 | +### On-demand processing |
| 229 | + |
| 230 | +*On-demand processing in this context means that processing is only executed for extents shown to* |
| 231 | +*the user, e.g. on a web map. Results are processed "on demand" depending on the interaction with* |
| 232 | +*the map (e.g. how Google Earth Engine does it in their Code Editor by default).* |
| 233 | + |
| 234 | + TBD, lower priority as it's not covered by OAP1. It's also optional and very different in openEO. |
| 235 | + Instead it is defined as a separate OAP1 API implementation for individual OGC API resources. |
| 236 | + For example, a combination of OGC API - Maps and OGC API - Processes. |
| 237 | + |
| 238 | +## File Storage |
| 239 | + |
| 240 | +- openEO: `/files` (various methods), `/files/{path}` (various methods) |
| 241 | +- OAP1: n/a |
| 242 | + |
| 243 | +As it is neither available in OAP1 nor in any of the OGC APIs, we don't make any comparisons here. |
0 commit comments