Added Timestamp for each Moving Object. #546
Closed
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Signed-off-by: Nader Thomas thomas.nader@bmw.de
Add a description
The simulation timestamp the calculated "base" parameters (especially "position") of the moving object apply to.
Background: The timestamps can differ between e.g. host vehicle, rest of the vehicle traffic and pedestrians (or other types), because they may be calculated in different modules. And even inside those groups the timestamps can differ if one part is calculated in one cycle and the rest in the following cycle out of performance reasons.
Usage: E.g. for extrapolation of the whole traffic in graphic engines.
Some questions to ask:
What is this change? What does it fix?
The groundTruth timestamp is too unspecific and not working for that use case.
Is this a bug fix or a feature? Does it break any existing functionality or force me to update to a new version?
No.
How has it been tested?
Yes and working. Tested by Christopher Kiwus.
Take this checklist as orientation for yourself, if this PR is ready for the Change Control Board:
If you can’t check all of them, please explain why.
If all boxes are checked or commented and you have achieved at least one positive review, you can assign the label ReadyForCCBReview!