Skip to content

Move away from irrklang to a more permissive audio engine #451

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Open
adriengivry opened this issue Apr 14, 2025 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #452
Open

Move away from irrklang to a more permissive audio engine #451

adriengivry opened this issue Apr 14, 2025 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #452
Labels
Feature New feature to the engine Refactoring Something that needs a refactoring

Comments

@adriengivry
Copy link
Member

Problem this feature should fix
irrKlang's license isn't that permissive:

It is free for non-commercial use. The commercial version is named 'irrKlang pro' and has pricing schemes ideal for independent developers.

Expected solution
We should investigate alternative solutions, and move away from irrKlang. The new solution's sources will be compiled alongside Overload.
@adriengivry adriengivry added Feature New feature to the engine Refactoring Something that needs a refactoring labels Apr 14, 2025
@adriengivry adriengivry linked a pull request Apr 14, 2025 that will close this issue
Open
5 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Feature New feature to the engine Refactoring Something that needs a refactoring
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

Reworked Audio Engine to use SoLoud instead of irrKlang Overload-Technologies/Overload
1 participant
@adriengivry