Remove incorrect analyser for Worker Functions

[warwickschroeder]

The analyser has not been released.

[DavidBoike]

Weekly docs changes review editor curiosity: How did it get in here in the first place? Is it going to be released? Could the documentation be restored with a "To be released in version N" comment or in a partial that will take effect with the correct version, or something like that? Alternatively, is the re-addition of the docs tracked somewhere?

[warwickschroeder]

Weekly docs changes review editor curiosity: How did it get in here in the first place? Is it going to be released? Could the documentation be restored with a "To be released in version N" comment or in a partial that will take effect with the correct version, or something like that? Alternatively, is the re-addition of the docs tracked somewhere?

This PR added the analyser info to docs prematurely. It was decided the analyser alone didnt warrant a full release, so it was added to a vNext milestone. A new draft PR has been created to add the analyser info back into docs, and has been linked. In hindsight a partial with a version greater than the current would have been a much better approach to this, and probably is still a better approach. I'll discuss this with the TF and potentially do this to close this off.