Skip to content

Spotify update Get Playlist Action #17895

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Spotify update Get Playlist Action #17895

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

michelle0927
Copy link
Collaborator

@michelle0927 michelle0927 commented Jul 31, 2025

Resolves #17862

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved handling of playlist IDs in the "Get a Playlist" action to support multiple input formats, ensuring more reliable playlist retrieval.
  • Chores

    • Updated version numbers for the "Get a Playlist" action and the Spotify package.

Copy link

vercel bot commented Jul 31, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

3 Skipped Deployments
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
docs-v2 ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Jul 31, 2025 4:42pm
pipedream-docs ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Jul 31, 2025 4:42pm
pipedream-docs-redirect-do-not-edit ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Jul 31, 2025 4:42pm

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 31, 2025

Walkthrough

The "Get a Playlist" action in the Spotify component was updated to handle both object and primitive forms of the playlistId input, using a conditional expression to extract the correct value. Corresponding summary messaging was updated, and the action and package versions were incremented.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Change Summary
Spotify Get Playlist action logic
components/spotify/actions/get-playlist/get-playlist.mjs
Updated to support playlistId as either an object with a value property or a primitive; incremented action version to 0.0.2; updated summary messaging accordingly.
Spotify package version
components/spotify/package.json
Incremented package version from 0.7.2 to 0.7.3.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant GetPlaylistAction
    participant SpotifyAPI

    User->>GetPlaylistAction: Provide playlistId (object or primitive)
    GetPlaylistAction->>GetPlaylistAction: Extract playlistId using playlistId?.value || playlistId
    GetPlaylistAction->>SpotifyAPI: getPlaylist(playlistId)
    SpotifyAPI-->>GetPlaylistAction: Playlist data
    GetPlaylistAction-->>User: Return playlist data
Loading

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~7 minutes

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Support for both object and primitive playlistId inputs in Get Playlist action (#17862)
Prevent 400 Bad Request when using custom expressions/variables for playlistId (#17862)

Assessment against linked issues: Out-of-scope changes

No out-of-scope changes found.

Poem

A playlist hop, a version bump,
Now IDs work, no matter the jump!
Whether object or string,
The music will sing—
Bugs are gone, let Spotify thump!
🐰🎶


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 752939a and be8ad85.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • pnpm-lock.yaml is excluded by !**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • components/spotify/actions/get-playlist/get-playlist.mjs (2 hunks)
  • components/spotify/package.json (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (2)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: GTFalcao
PR: PipedreamHQ/pipedream#12731
File: components/hackerone/actions/get-members/get-members.mjs:3-28
Timestamp: 2024-10-08T15:33:38.240Z
Learning: When exporting a summary message in the `run` method of an action, ensure the message is correctly formatted. For example, in the `hackerone-get-members` action, the correct format is `Successfully retrieved ${response.data.length} members`.
Learnt from: GTFalcao
PR: PipedreamHQ/pipedream#12731
File: components/hackerone/actions/get-members/get-members.mjs:3-28
Timestamp: 2024-07-04T18:11:59.822Z
Learning: When exporting a summary message in the `run` method of an action, ensure the message is correctly formatted. For example, in the `hackerone-get-members` action, the correct format is `Successfully retrieved ${response.data.length} members`.
📚 Learning: when developing pipedream components, do not add built-in node.js modules like `fs` to `package.json...
Learnt from: jcortes
PR: PipedreamHQ/pipedream#14935
File: components/sailpoint/package.json:15-18
Timestamp: 2024-12-12T19:23:09.039Z
Learning: When developing Pipedream components, do not add built-in Node.js modules like `fs` to `package.json` dependencies, as they are native modules provided by the Node.js runtime.

Applied to files:

  • components/spotify/package.json
🔇 Additional comments (4)
components/spotify/package.json (1)

3-3: LGTM! Appropriate version increment for bug fix.

The patch version increment from 0.7.2 to 0.7.3 correctly follows semantic versioning for the bug fix implemented in the get-playlist action.

components/spotify/actions/get-playlist/get-playlist.mjs (3)

7-7: LGTM! Appropriate version increment for the bug fix.

The minor version increment from 0.0.1 to 0.0.2 correctly reflects the bug fix nature of this change.


26-26: Excellent fix for the playlist ID handling bug.

The conditional logic playlistId?.value || playlistId properly addresses the core issue described in the PR objectives. This change ensures the action works with both:

  1. Async options (object with .value property)
  2. Custom expressions/variables (primitive values)

This should resolve the 400 Bad Request error that occurred when playlist ID was undefined in the API call.


29-29: Consistent conditional logic in summary message.

Good consistency in applying the same conditional logic (playlistId?.value || playlistId) to the summary message. This ensures the exported summary displays the correct playlist ID regardless of input format, following the learnings about proper summary message formatting.

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch issue-17862

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate unit tests to generate unit tests for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@michelle0927 michelle0927 requested a review from lcaresia July 31, 2025 16:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[BUG] Spotify Get Playlist Action doesn't work with custom expressions or variables
2 participants