Skip to content

Use math solver dispatch to separate math solver from main model #916

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 29 commits into from
Mar 17, 2025

Conversation

TonyXiang8787
Copy link
Member

This PR uses MathSolverDispatcher to separate the real implementation of math solver in a different translation unit. The handle of the dispatcher is an input argument for the constructor of the MainModel. In this way, the math solver function pointers are set in run-time.

The core library is still header-only but with clear boundaries. In C-API separate translation units can compile the MainModel and MathSolver.

This enables the conda-forge again without hitting the RAM limit. See conda-forge/power-grid-model-feedstock#328

Signed-off-by: Tony Xiang <19280867+TonyXiang8787@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Xiang <19280867+TonyXiang8787@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Xiang <19280867+TonyXiang8787@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Xiang <19280867+TonyXiang8787@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Xiang <19280867+TonyXiang8787@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Xiang <19280867+TonyXiang8787@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Xiang <19280867+TonyXiang8787@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Xiang <19280867+TonyXiang8787@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Xiang <19280867+TonyXiang8787@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Xiang <19280867+TonyXiang8787@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Xiang <19280867+TonyXiang8787@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Xiang <19280867+TonyXiang8787@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Xiang <19280867+TonyXiang8787@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Xiang <19280867+TonyXiang8787@users.noreply.github.com>
@TonyXiang8787 TonyXiang8787 requested a review from mgovers March 14, 2025 08:25
Signed-off-by: Tony Xiang <19280867+TonyXiang8787@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Xiang <19280867+TonyXiang8787@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Xiang <19280867+TonyXiang8787@users.noreply.github.com>
Copy link
Member

@mgovers mgovers left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

really nice!

Signed-off-by: Tony Xiang <19280867+TonyXiang8787@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Xiang <19280867+TonyXiang8787@users.noreply.github.com>
@Jerry-Jinfeng-Guo Jerry-Jinfeng-Guo added feature New feature or request improvement Improvement on internal implementation labels Mar 17, 2025
Signed-off-by: Tony Xiang <19280867+TonyXiang8787@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Xiang <19280867+TonyXiang8787@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Xiang <19280867+TonyXiang8787@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Xiang <19280867+TonyXiang8787@users.noreply.github.com>
mgovers
mgovers previously approved these changes Mar 17, 2025
Copy link
Member

@mgovers mgovers left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

One nitpick, otherwise looks great

…ath_solver/math_solver_dispatch.hpp

Co-authored-by: Martijn Govers <martijn.govers@alliander.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Xiang <19280867+TonyXiang8787@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Xiang <19280867+TonyXiang8787@users.noreply.github.com>
@TonyXiang8787
Copy link
Member Author

@mgovers please approve again. I will merge this after trying conda build again.

@TonyXiang8787 TonyXiang8787 added this pull request to the merge queue Mar 17, 2025
Merged via the queue into main with commit 5c600d9 Mar 17, 2025
28 checks passed
@TonyXiang8787 TonyXiang8787 deleted the math-solver-dispatch branch March 17, 2025 21:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feature New feature or request improvement Improvement on internal implementation
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants