We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
cow_utils
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
cow_utils really improve performance?
I ran the official benchmark of cow_utils, I used m1 and m4 separately, tried many times, and the results were similar.
In the replace case, looks like the cow is pretty good, but in the to_lowercase, the cow is lagging behind in all three given situations.
replace
to_lowercase
Is my method incorrect? Or is it acceptable because the sample situation is special?
Replace in "aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa"/replace/("a", "") time: [176.95 ns 177.30 ns 177.64 ns] Found 6 outliers among 100 measurements (6.00%) 1 (1.00%) low severe 2 (2.00%) low mild 2 (2.00%) high mild 1 (1.00%) high severe Replace in "aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa"/cow_replace/("a", "") time: [129.38 ns 129.77 ns 130.12 ns] Found 16 outliers among 100 measurements (16.00%) 7 (7.00%) low severe 3 (3.00%) low mild 5 (5.00%) high mild 1 (1.00%) high severe Replace in "aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa"/replace/("b", "c") time: [36.169 ns 36.484 ns 36.877 ns] Found 9 outliers among 100 measurements (9.00%) 4 (4.00%) high mild 5 (5.00%) high severe Replace in "aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa"/cow_replace/("b", "c") time: [18.609 ns 18.769 ns 18.970 ns] Found 3 outliers among 100 measurements (3.00%) 2 (2.00%) high mild 1 (1.00%) high severe Replace in "aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa"/replace/("a", "b") time: [325.59 ns 328.93 ns 332.02 ns] Replace in "aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa"/cow_replace/("a", "b") time: [302.97 ns 306.83 ns 311.13 ns] Found 3 outliers among 100 measurements (3.00%) 2 (2.00%) high mild 1 (1.00%) high severe To Lowercase/to_lowercase/Ax40 time: [19.452 ns 19.561 ns 19.669 ns] Found 4 outliers among 100 measurements (4.00%) 3 (3.00%) high mild 1 (1.00%) high severe To Lowercase/cow_to_lowercase/Ax40 time: [21.313 ns 21.444 ns 21.619 ns] Found 1 outliers among 100 measurements (1.00%) 1 (1.00%) high severe To Lowercase/to_lowercase/ax40 time: [19.870 ns 20.003 ns 20.167 ns] change: [+1.6515% +2.4320% +3.2139%] (p = 0.00 < 0.05) Performance has regressed. Found 2 outliers among 100 measurements (2.00%) 1 (1.00%) high mild 1 (1.00%) high severe To Lowercase/cow_to_lowercase/ax40 time: [95.169 ns 95.764 ns 96.785 ns] change: [+342.20% +345.10% +348.79%] (p = 0.00 < 0.05) Performance has regressed. Found 9 outliers among 100 measurements (9.00%) 4 (4.00%) high mild 5 (5.00%) high severe To Lowercase/to_lowercase/ax20 + Ax20 time: [19.704 ns 19.807 ns 19.914 ns] Found 2 outliers among 100 measurements (2.00%) 2 (2.00%) high mild To Lowercase/cow_to_lowercase/ax20 + Ax20 time: [70.502 ns 70.723 ns 70.983 ns] Found 8 outliers among 100 measurements (8.00%) 3 (3.00%) high mild 5 (5.00%) high severe
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hm perhaps the stdlib changed implementation as it's been a while, or perhaps it's different on those CPUs... Hard to say without further digging.
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
cow_utils
really improve performance?I ran the official benchmark of
cow_utils
, I used m1 and m4 separately, tried many times, and the results were similar.In the
replace
case, looks like the cow is pretty good, but in theto_lowercase
, the cow is lagging behind in all three given situations.Is my method incorrect? Or is it acceptable because the sample situation is special?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: