This repository was archived by the owner on Mar 25, 2019. It is now read-only.
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9
Create rook-integration-validation.md #5
Open
BlaineEXE
wants to merge
2
commits into
SUSE:master
Choose a base branch
from
BlaineEXE:patch-2
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,79 @@ | ||
Rook (Ceph) Storage Itegration Validation | ||
|
||
| Field | Value | | ||
|:-------|:-----------| | ||
| Status | Draft | | ||
| Date | 2018-07-31 | | ||
|
||
## Introduction | ||
|
||
The Rook project (https://rook.io) aims to orchestrate file, block, and object | ||
storage on Kubernetes. Of note, Rook can orchestrate Ceph storage, which can | ||
provide all 3 of these access types with one underlying storage technology. | ||
We propose to include basic validation for Rook into the Kubic-Project's | ||
continuous integration environment. | ||
|
||
### Problem description | ||
|
||
This change is important for ensuring that Kubic-Project is able to host Rook | ||
reliably. | ||
|
||
### Proposed change | ||
|
||
As part of Kubic-Project's CI suite, install Rook (Ceph) and perform some basic | ||
high-level tests to verify that persistent block, file, and object storage | ||
is made available by Rook. | ||
|
||
## Detailed RFC | ||
|
||
A general overview of steps toward validating Rook: | ||
1. Install a Rook (Ceph) cluster on Kubic-Project | ||
2. Create a persistent volume claim against Rook (Ceph) block storage, and | ||
test that the storage works for read and write and is persistent. | ||
3. Create a PVC against Rook (Ceph) file storage, and test that it works | ||
for read and write and is persistent. | ||
4. Create a PVC against Rook (Ceph) object storage, and test that it works | ||
for read and write and is persistent. | ||
5. Optional/for further discussion: Run Rook's test suites against the test | ||
Rook install. | ||
|
||
Steps 2-5 are independent of each other, but all are dependent on 1. | ||
|
||
Rook has good documentation regarding how to deploy a rook-ceph cluster on its | ||
website (https://rook.io). Doc source is on GitHub (https://github.com/rook/rook). | ||
Additionally, the requesting author (@BlaineEXE) can help with any of the aboe | ||
steps. | ||
|
||
### Proposed change (Detailed) | ||
|
||
Currently Rook uses FlexVolumes to make storage available. The initial version(s) | ||
of this feature should validate the integration between Rook and Kubic-Project's | ||
FlexVolume support. At a yet undetermined time in the future, Rook will deprecate | ||
the FlexVolume implementation in favor of a CSI driver. At that time, this feature | ||
will need to be updated to validate this CSI-layer integration. | ||
|
||
The steps outlined in the section above may likely represent incremental milestones | ||
toward implementing this full feature, and it may be that there is a fair bit of | ||
time between each individual implementation. Steps 1 and 2 above are fairly well | ||
understood by @BlaineEXE. | ||
|
||
*More changes to be proposed by CaaSP team members.* | ||
|
||
### Dependencies | ||
|
||
*Dependencies to be proposed by CaaSP team members.* | ||
|
||
### Concerns and Unresolved Questions | ||
|
||
*Concerns to be proposed by CaaSP team members.* | ||
|
||
## Alternatives | ||
|
||
Currently, no alternatives to this proposal have been identified. Discussion is | ||
welcome. | ||
|
||
## Revision History: | ||
|
||
| Date | Comment | Author | | ||
|:-----------|:--------------|:------------------------| | ||
| 2018-07-31 | Initial Draft | Blaine Gardner | |
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
And make sure, Ceph is healthy. aka
HEALTH_OK