-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 28
Assignment 1
$tree Assignment-1
├── Assignment-1.cpp
├── Assignment-1.h
├── CMakeLists.txt
├── SrcSnk.txt
└── Tests
├── CMakeLists.txt
├── test.cpp
└── testcases
└── icfg
├── test1.c
├── test1.ll
├── test2.c
└── test2.ll
└── pta
├── test1.c
├── test1.ll
├── test2.c
└── test2.ll
├── test3.c
└── test3.ll
├── test4.c
└── test4.ll
└── taint
├── test1.c
├── test1.ll
├── test2.c
└── test2.ll
* Before coding, please type cd $HOME/Software-Security-Analysis
and git pull
in your terminal to make sure you always have the latest version of the code template before each assignment.
If git pull
fails due to the conflict with your local changes, type git stash
to store your current code in a temporal branch and type git pull
again. If you want to retrieve your code back, type git stash pop
.
- Implement the following methods of class
ICFGTraversal
andAndersenPTA
inAssignment-1.cpp
.
Function | Description | Marks |
---|---|---|
readSrcSnkFromFile |
Identify sources and sinks by parsing APIs in SrcSnk.txt for reachability analysis |
20% |
reachability |
Context-sensitive reachability analysis on the ICFG | 30% |
solveWorklist |
Field-sensitive inclusion-based points-to analysis (Andersen's analysis) | 30% |
aliasCheck |
Check aliases of the two variables at source and sink. Two variables are aliases if their points-to sets have at least one overlapping element. |
20% |
-
Tainted Information Flow: Given a tainted source
v1@src
(variablev1
at program pointsrc
), we say that a sinkv2@snk
is also tainted if both the following conditions satisfy: (1)src
reachessnk
on the ICFG via context-sensitive reachability analysis, and (2) pts(v1
) ∩ pts(v2
) ≠ ∅ inferred by Andersen's field-sensitive analysis. Note that in this assignment,v1
is the return value when calling a source function, andv2
is any argument of the sink function. -
Tips for implementing
reachability
andsolveWorklist
. The implementation ofreachability
differs from the one in Lab-Exercise-1 in that the paths collected need to be feasible in terms of context sensitivity (calls and returns ICFGNodes must match on each program path). The implementation ofsolveWorklist
also differs from the one in Lab-Exercise-1 by following an additional field-sensitive rule, which distinguishes fields of each struct but is array-insensitive (treating all elements of an array as one object). Please refer to this API to obtain a field object (getGepObjVar
) given a struct object and a field index.
C-like form | Constraint form | Solving rule | Explaination |
---|---|---|---|
p = &o | p <--ADDR-- o | pts(p) = pts(p) ∪ {o} | add o into p 's points-to set |
q = p | q <--COPY-- p | pts(q) = pts(q) ∪ pts(p) | union p 's points-to set into q 's one |
q = *p | q <--LOAD-- p | for each o ∈ pts(p) : q <--COPY-- o | for each o in p 's points-to set, add a COPY edge from o to q (if it is not on the graph) |
*q = p | q <--STORE-- p | for each o ∈ pts(q) : o <--COPY-- p | for each o in q 's points-to set, add a COPY edge from p to o (if it is not on the graph) |
q = &p->fld | q <--GEP, fld-- p | for each o ∈ pts(p) : pts(q) = pts(q) ∪ {o.fld} | for each o in p 's points-to set, add o 's field object o.fld into q 's points-to set |
- To test your implementation (sanity checks)
Your implementation | ctest command line |
---|---|
Your reachability analysis | ctest -R ass1-icfg -VV |
Your points-to analysis | ctest -R ass1-pta -VV |
Your taint analysis | ctest -R ass1-taint -VV |
The entire Assignment-1 | ctest -R ass1 -VV |
-
Debugging TIPs for printing out the points-to sets and Constraint Graph. Add
-print-pts
as an extra option for yourass1
when you try to print the points-to set of each node to validate your MAYALIAS and NOALIAS results. You could also use-print-constraint-graph
to print out the constraint graph (edges and nodes) or-dump-constraint-graph
to dump it into a dot file to view in VSCode. -
Upload
Assignment-1.cpp
to UNSWWebCMS
for your submission when you are finished with this assignment. Your implementation will be evaluated against our 10 internal tests. You will get the full marks if your code can pass them all. Our internal tests are private. Here, we only provided a handful test cases underAssignment-1/Tests/testcases
. You are encouraged to add more test cases by yourself to validate the correctness of your implementation.
*You will be working on Assignment-1.cpp
only and there is NO need to modify other files under the Assignment-1 folder
3.1 launch.json
To enable debugging and running, switch your executable by setting the program
and args
fields as described here or follow the below screenshot.
- 'Step over' to the next step of your program
- 'Step in' to the current line of your program
- 'Step out' to mainstream of your program where you stepped in before