Skip to content

Conversation

sf-henry-semaganda
Copy link
Contributor

@sf-henry-semaganda sf-henry-semaganda commented Aug 12, 2025

Description

Shipping options showed base prices instead of after promotional pricing when applicable or otherwise, creating mismatch with promotional messages.
Solution was to use updated shipping options from basket data instead of getShippingMethodsForShipment API base prices.

shipping_pricing.mov

Types of Changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change that fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change that adds functionality)
  • Documentation update
  • Breaking change (could cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • Other changes (non-breaking changes that does not fit any of the above)

Breaking changes include:

  • Removing a public function or component or prop
  • Adding a required argument to a function
  • Changing the data type of a function parameter or return value
  • Adding a new peer dependency to package.json

Changes

  • (change1)

How to Test-Drive This PR

Testing Steps

  • Navigate to checkout with items that trigger shipping promotions
  • Go to shipping options step - verify promotional pricing display messages (e.g., £0.00 for free shipping)
  • Switch between edit/summary modes - ensure pricing remains consistent
  • Check cart summary shipping totals - verify shipping costs match between shipping options and cart summary
  • Test multiple shipments as well and - confirm individual and total shipping costs show promotional pricing correctly

Checklists

General

  • Changes are covered by test cases
  • CHANGELOG.md updated with a short description of changes (not required for documentation updates)

Accessibility Compliance

You must check off all items in one of the follow two lists:

  • There are no changes to UI

or...

Localization

  • Changes include a UI text update in the Retail React App (which requires translation)

aditek-sf and others added 22 commits July 31, 2025 09:15
Show only delivery items in multiship view
…ShippingMethodButtonfunctionality

Signed-off-by: Aditya Tekur <126732792+aditek-sf@users.noreply.github.com>
…k/W-19159882/fixShippingMethodButtonfunctionality

@W-19159882 - fix shipping method button functionality
Fix Shipment Setting on Continue to Shipping Method
* Shipping Options for MultiShip
* show multi ship address product UI and add local component state addresses

* rebase with feature main

* harmonize variable namings for guest vs registered

* enaable/disable continue button when form open or no addresses for bth guest and authed user

* update selected address for both guest and registered

* display address product from loaded basket data

* revert unnesssary top state from shipping

* nit: remove extra line

* fix if block

* update selected addresses to correspond to both guest and registered user

* update tests

* update build files

* update multi ship to only look at delivery items

---------

Signed-off-by: sf-henry-semaganda <henry.semaganda@salesforce.com>
…ipment (#3015)

* should should set all addresses of each pickup shipment

* update component tests
@sf-henry-semaganda sf-henry-semaganda requested a review from a team as a code owner August 12, 2025 22:30
@cc-prodsec
Copy link
Collaborator

cc-prodsec commented Aug 12, 2025

🎉 Snyk checks have passed. No issues have been found so far.

security/snyk check is complete. No issues have been found. (View Details)

license/snyk check is complete. No issues have been found. (View Details)

@sf-henry-semaganda sf-henry-semaganda marked this pull request as draft August 12, 2025 22:38
@sf-henry-semaganda sf-henry-semaganda added the skip changelog Skip the "Changelog Check" GitHub Actions step even if the Changelog.md files are not updated label Aug 13, 2025
Base automatically changed from feature/multiship to develop August 27, 2025 00:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
skip changelog Skip the "Changelog Check" GitHub Actions step even if the Changelog.md files are not updated
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants