Skip to content

Conversation

ChrisRackauckas
Copy link
Member

Summary

This PR enhances the ExplicitImports QA testing infrastructure for DiffEqFlux.jl by adding comprehensive explicit imports validation.

Changes Made

  • Enhanced ExplicitImports Testing: Added check_no_self_qualified_accesses test to the existing QA testing suite
  • Comprehensive Import Validation: All explicit imports tests pass, confirming excellent import practices
  • QA Infrastructure: ExplicitImports and ReTestItems testing already properly configured in test dependencies

Testing Status

  • ✅ All explicit imports tests pass
  • ✅ No implicit imports detected
  • ✅ No stale explicit imports found
  • ✅ No self-qualified accesses found
  • ✅ QA testing infrastructure working correctly

Analysis Results

DiffEqFlux.jl already has excellent explicit import practices! The codebase passes all ExplicitImports.jl checks:

  • No implicit imports: All imports are explicit and properly declared
  • No stale imports: All imported symbols are actually used
  • No self-qualified accesses: Proper module qualification practices
  • Proper test setup: ExplicitImports testing infrastructure is correctly configured

This PR simply adds one additional check to make the QA testing even more comprehensive.

Impact

  • Improves code quality assurance
  • Ensures comprehensive explicit imports validation
  • Maintains excellent import practices in the codebase
  • No breaking changes or dependencies added

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

This commit improves the ExplicitImports testing by adding an additional check
for self-qualified accesses, making the QA testing more comprehensive.

Changes:
- Added check_no_self_qualified_accesses test to qa_tests.jl
- Ensures comprehensive explicit imports validation

All explicit imports tests continue to pass with these enhancements.

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
@ChrisRackauckas ChrisRackauckas deleted the explicit-imports-improvements branch August 1, 2025 11:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants