don't reset accept-step so SciMLBase.check_error can look at it #2210
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
oscardssmith
force-pushed
the
os/no-reset-accept-step
branch
from
dda9222 to
d52d780
Compare
ChrisRackauckas
approved these changes
May 23, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This line was unnecessarily setting
accept_stepto false which madecheck_errorthink that your step was always rejected. This was what caused the DelayDiffEq failures on SciML/SciMLBase.jl#693. The problem, however isn't delay problem specific, it just turns out delay diffeqs are much more likely to have tiny timesteps.