[js] update the doc in virtual_authenticator.md

[sangcnguyen]

User description

Thanks for contributing to the Selenium site and documentation!
A PR well described will help maintainers to review and merge it quickly

Before submitting your PR, please check our contributing guidelines.
Avoid large PRs, and help reviewers by making them as simple and short as possible.

Description

Motivation and Context

Types of changes

• Change to the site (I have double-checked the Netlify deployment, and my changes look good)
• Code example added (and I also added the example to all translated languages)
• Improved translation
• Added new translation (and I also added a notice to each document missing translation)

Checklist

• I have read the contributing document.
• I have used hugo to render the site/docs locally and I am sure it works.

---

PR Type

Documentation, Tests

---

Description

• Added a new test case in virtualAuthenticator.spec.js to set and verify the user verification status.
• Updated the English, Japanese, Portuguese, and Chinese documentation to include specific JavaScript code block references for better clarity.

---

Changes walkthrough 📝

	Relevant files
Tests	virtualAuthenticator.spec.js Add test case for setting user verification status              examples/javascript/test/virtual_authenticator/virtualAuthenticator.spec.js Added a new test case to set user verification status. Verified the isUserVerified option is set correctly. +5/-0
Documentation	virtual_authenticator.en.md Update JavaScript code references in documentation              website_and_docs/content/documentation/webdriver/interactions/virtual_authenticator.en.md Updated JavaScript code examples with specific code block references. +5/-5      virtual_authenticator.ja.md Update JavaScript code references in Japanese documentation website_and_docs/content/documentation/webdriver/interactions/virtual_authenticator.ja.md Updated JavaScript code examples with specific code block references. +5/-0      virtual_authenticator.pt-br.md Update JavaScript code references in Portuguese documentation website_and_docs/content/documentation/webdriver/interactions/virtual_authenticator.pt-br.md Updated JavaScript code examples with specific code block references. +5/-0      virtual_authenticator.zh-cn.md Update JavaScript code references in Chinese documentation website_and_docs/content/documentation/webdriver/interactions/virtual_authenticator.zh-cn.md Updated JavaScript code examples with specific code block references. +5/-0

---

💡 PR-Agent usage:
Comment /help on the PR to get a list of all available PR-Agent tools and their descriptions

[netlify]

👷 Deploy request for selenium-dev pending review.

Visit the deploys page to approve it

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	0a00efe

[qodo-merge-pro]

PR Review 🔍

⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]	2, because the PR primarily involves documentation updates and a straightforward addition of a test case. The changes are localized and do not seem to involve complex logic changes.
🧪 Relevant tests	Yes
⚡ Possible issues	Possible Bug: The test case 'Set is user verified' directly accesses a private property '_isUserVerified'. This is generally not recommended as it breaks encapsulation. Consider using a public method or property to check the user verification status.
🔒 Security concerns	No

[qodo-merge-pro]

PR Code Suggestions ✨

Category	Suggestion	Score
Best practice	Avoid direct access to private properties by using public methods or getters Instead of directly accessing the private property _isUserVerified, use a public method or getter if available. Direct access to private properties can lead to maintenance issues and breaks encapsulation. examples/javascript/test/virtual_authenticator/virtualAuthenticator.spec.js [199] -assert(options['_isUserVerified'] === true); +assert(options.isUserVerified === true); // Assuming `isUserVerified` is a public getter Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8 Why: The suggestion correctly identifies a best practice in JavaScript to use getters instead of accessing private properties directly, which enhances encapsulation and maintainability.	8
Possible issue	Add a type check before calling setIsUserVerified to prevent potential runtime errors Add a check to ensure that options.setIsUserVerified is a function before calling it. This will make the code more robust and prevent potential runtime errors. examples/javascript/test/virtual_authenticator/virtualAuthenticator.spec.js [197] -options.setIsUserVerified(true); +if (typeof options.setIsUserVerified === 'function') { + options.setIsUserVerified(true); +} else { + throw new Error('setIsUserVerified is not a function'); +} Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7 Why: Adding a type check before invoking a method is a good defensive programming practice that can prevent runtime errors, making the code more robust.	7
	Add an assertion to check the existence of the setIsUserVerified method before calling it Add an assertion to verify that the setIsUserVerified method actually exists on the options object before calling it. This will help catch errors early in the test. examples/javascript/test/virtual_authenticator/virtualAuthenticator.spec.js [197] +assert(typeof options.setIsUserVerified === 'function'); options.setIsUserVerified(true); Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7 Why: This suggestion improves the test by ensuring the method exists before calling it, which is particularly useful in dynamic languages like JavaScript.	7
Enhancement	Add a test case to verify the behavior when setIsUserVerified is set to false Add a test case to verify the behavior when setIsUserVerified is set to false. This will ensure that both true and false scenarios are covered in the tests. examples/javascript/test/virtual_authenticator/virtualAuthenticator.spec.js [196-200] it('Set is user verified', async function() { options.setIsUserVerified(true); assert(options['_isUserVerified'] === true); }); +it('Set is user not verified', async function() { + options.setIsUserVerified(false); + + assert(options['_isUserVerified'] === false); +}); + Suggestion importance[1-10]: 6 Why: Adding a test case for the opposite condition is a valuable enhancement for covering more scenarios and ensuring the robustness of the testing suite.	6

[harsha509]

Thank you @sangcnguyen !