-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 588
Update to 1.21 #4248
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update to 1.21 #4248
Conversation
Pro Tip!
If your changes do not fall into any of these categories, don't worry. You can just ignore this message in that case! 👀 |
Slimefun preview buildA Slimefun preview build is available for testing! https://preview-builds.walshy.dev/download/Slimefun/4248/e7d9232e
|
a5de53e
to
9f175bf
Compare
This still needs major testing |
41f9139
to
afaf3aa
Compare
afaf3aa
to
c84e876
Compare
ItemStack item = new CustomItemStack(Material.BEACON, "&cItem Test"); | ||
String id = "IS_ITEM_TEST"; | ||
SlimefunItem sfItem = TestUtilities.mockSlimefunItem(plugin, id, item); | ||
SlimefunItem sfItem = TestUtilities.mockSlimefunItem(plugin, id, new CustomItemStack(Material.BEACON, "&cItem Test")); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What's the point of this?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think its testing that SlimefunItem#register
should change the underlying ItemStack
in some way, thus sfItem#isItem
should return false even if the twoItemStack
s were the same when we started.
testing produced multiple errors immediately which stopped any further testing. I've linked them from the contributors channel on discord. https://discord.com/channels/565557184348422174/565570276038017044/1290525215461216266 |
…istener to use the wrapper on Player#getOpenInventory
|
Is there 1.21 build available? where? ty mate |
Co-authored-by: Daniel Walsh <walshydev@gmail.com>
|
This comment was marked as off-topic.
This comment was marked as off-topic.
please leave unproductive comments like these out of the PR discussion. since you clearly didn't look at what's going on and seen the progress, you aren't helping anyone. |
yay the checklist is shrinking |
Wondering what still needs to be done, Both this and the itemstack rewrite have been waiting to merge for almost a month now. |
Update Addon to Support this pull request : Slimefun/Slimefun4#4248 We will need to change the pom.xml at the end, when there will be an update for 1.21
Update Addon to Support this pull request : Slimefun/Slimefun4#4248 We will need to change the build.gradle.kts at the end, when there will be an update for 1.21
i made a conflict resolution Branch. |
Hello |
It will probably take a long time; it seems like they have abandoned the Slimefun project. |
|
Thanks for Experimental version for Minecraft 1.21 |
Shame this is abandonware now, used to be a solid plugin |
@LordDarce Please don't spread misinformation. Slimefun is an open-source project maintained by community devs in their free time. Plus, this PR was merged 2 weeks ago, calling it "abandoned" makes no sense at all. |
I'm not documenting the Devs abysmal behavior for you, chief. You can do your own research if you're so upset |
stop wasting everyone's time with spreading lies. and stop commenting on here. |
I've locked conversation on this pull requests as I have received a complaint report about the conversation here.
@LordDarce I understand the concern, feel free to voice it on discord but please don't post spam on our pull requests. |
Description
Updates to 1.21 - big shout out to MockBukkit team and @Intybyte for the work on tests
Proposed changes
Updated Slimefun code to support 1.21
Related Issues (if applicable)
N/A
Checklist
Nonnull
andNullable
annotations to my methods to indicate their behaviour for null values