Add files via upload

certificates.py

@@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
+# certificates.py
+
+# Import any necessary standard libraries or utility functions
+import random
+import hashlib
+
+class CertificateHandler:
+    def __init__(self):
+        # Initialization logic if needed
+        pass
+
+    def generate_certificate(self, problem_instance):
+        """
+        Generate a certificate for a given NP problem instance.
+        The certificate format depends on the problem’s structure.
+        """
+        # Placeholder: Replace with actual certificate generation logic
+        certificate = {
+            "witness": self._generate_witness(problem_instance),
+            "hash": self._hash_instance(problem_instance)
+        }
+        return certificate
+
+    def verify_certificate(self, problem_instance, certificate):
+        """
+        Verify a given certificate for the given problem instance.
+        Returns True if the certificate is valid, False otherwise.
+        """
+        # Extract witness and expected hash from the certificate
+        witness = certificate.get("witness")
+        expected_hash = certificate.get("hash")
+
+        # Validate the witness and the hash
+        if witness and self._hash_instance(problem_instance) == expected_hash:
+            # Placeholder logic: Assume the witness is a solution if it passes certain checks
+            return self._is_valid_witness(problem_instance, witness)
+        return False
+
+    def _generate_witness(self, problem_instance):
+        """
+        Private helper to generate a "witness" for a given problem instance.
+        In a real implementation, this might involve producing a string that
+        satisfies certain conditions (e.g., a satisfying assignment for a SAT formula).
+        """
+        # Simplified example: Return a random string as a stand-in for a valid witness
+        return "".join(random.choices("01", k=16))
+
+    def _hash_instance(self, problem_instance):
+        """
+        Compute a hash of the problem instance to ensure certificates match
+        the correct instance.
+        """
+        # Convert the problem instance to a string (or bytes) and hash it
+        instance_string = str(problem_instance)  # Replace with proper serialization
+        return hashlib.sha256(instance_string.encode()).hexdigest()
+
+    def _is_valid_witness(self, problem_instance, witness):
+        """
+        Check whether the given witness satisfies the conditions of the problem.
+        This would involve problem-specific logic, such as verifying that
+        a Boolean formula is satisfied by the witness, or that a graph property holds.
+        """
+        # Placeholder: Always return True as a simplification
+        # Replace with real checks in a full implementation
+        return True
+
+# If this module is run directly, you might test the CertificateHandler
+if __name__ == "__main__":
+    handler = CertificateHandler()
+    sample_instance = {"some": "problem"}
+    cert = handler.generate_certificate(sample_instance)
+    is_valid = handler.verify_certificate(sample_instance, cert)
+    print("Certificate:", cert)
+    print("Is valid:", is_valid)

core.py

@@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
+# core.py
+
+# Imports: Assume we’re using various utility modules and libraries
+from certificates import CertificateHandler
+from reductions import Reducer
+from lower_bounds import CircuitLowerBoundAnalyzer
+from proof_systems import ProofVerifier
+from topology_tools import TopologyAnalyzer
+
+class Core:
+    def __init__(self):
+        # Initialize various components and handlers
+        self.certificate_handler = CertificateHandler()
+        self.reducer = Reducer()
+        self.lower_bound_analyzer = CircuitLowerBoundAnalyzer()
+        self.proof_verifier = ProofVerifier()
+        self.topology_analyzer = TopologyAnalyzer()
+
+    def verify_proof(self, problem_instance, proof):
+        """
+        Verify the provided proof for a given problem instance.
+        """
+        return self.proof_verifier.verify(problem_instance, proof)
+
+    def simulate_algorithm(self, problem_instance):
+        """
+        Simulate a hypothetical algorithm on a given problem instance
+        and return the result.
+        """
+        # Placeholder: Replace with actual simulation logic
+        simulated_result = self.reducer.reduce(problem_instance)
+        is_valid = self.certificate_handler.verify_certificate(simulated_result)
+        return simulated_result, is_valid
+
+    def analyze_hardness(self, problem_instance):
+        """
+        Perform complexity analysis, checking circuit lower bounds and
+        other measures of computational difficulty.
+        """
+        circuit_bound = self.lower_bound_analyzer.estimate_bound(problem_instance)
+        topological_analysis = self.topology_analyzer.analyze(problem_instance)
+        return {
+            "circuit_bound": circuit_bound,
+            "topological_analysis": topological_analysis
+        }
+
+    def reduce_problem(self, source_problem, target_problem):
+        """
+        Reduce one problem to another using the reduction utilities.
+        """
+        return self.reducer.perform_reduction(source_problem, target_problem)
+
+# If this module is run directly, perhaps execute some default behavior
+if __name__ == "__main__":
+    core = Core()
+    # Here you might add test cases, or simple calls to the core methods
+    # to demonstrate functionality, e.g.,:
+    # result = core.simulate_algorithm(some_problem_instance)
+    # print(result)

examples.py

@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
+# examples.py
+
+from proof_systems import PropositionalProofSystem
+from topology_tools import TopologicalAnalyzer
+from experiments import run_sat_solver, analyze_instance_complexity
+
+def example_workflow():
+    # Demonstrate usage of the proof system
+    proof_system = PropositionalProofSystem("PROOF_OF(P)")
+    print("Proof valid:", proof_system.is_valid_proof("P"))
+    print("Proof size:", proof_system.proof_size())
+
+    # Demonstrate topology-based analysis
+    analyzer = TopologicalAnalyzer("ComplexBooleanFunction")
+    print("Topological complexity analysis:", analyzer.analyze_complexity())
+
+    # Demonstrate SAT solver experiments
+    print("SAT solver result:", run_sat_solver(10, 20))
+    solve_times = analyze_instance_complexity(5)
+    print("Instance solve times:", solve_times)
+
+if __name__ == "__main__":
+    example_workflow()

experiments.py

@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
+# experiments.py
+
+import random
+
+def run_sat_solver(num_vars, num_clauses):
+    """
+    Simulates running a SAT solver on random 3-CNF formulas.
+    For demonstration, this is a placeholder that just outputs random results.
+
+    Parameters:
+    num_vars (int): Number of variables in the formula.
+    num_clauses (int): Number of clauses in the formula.
+
+    Returns:
+    str: "SATISFIABLE" or "UNSATISFIABLE".
+    """
+    return random.choice(["SATISFIABLE", "UNSATISFIABLE"])
+
+def analyze_instance_complexity(num_instances):
+    """
+    Runs multiple SAT solver experiments and collects data on solve times.
+
+    Parameters:
+    num_instances (int): Number of instances to analyze.
+
+    Returns:
+    list: Simulated solve times for each instance.
+    """
+    return [random.uniform(0.1, 5.0) for _ in range(num_instances)]

lower_bounds.py

@@ -0,0 +1,86 @@
+# lower_bounds.py
+
+class CircuitLowerBound:
+    """
+    A class to explore and establish circuit complexity lower bounds
+    for Boolean functions. It includes methods to construct functions
+    that are hard to compute by small circuits and to formally prove
+    lower bounds for certain restricted circuit classes.
+    """
+    @staticmethod
+    def parity_lower_bound(n):
+        """
+        Proves that computing the parity function on n variables requires
+        circuits of size exponential in the depth, if the depth is constant.
+
+        Parameters:
+        n (int): The number of input variables.
+
+        Returns:
+        str: A statement of the lower bound for parity in the given setting.
+        """
+        # Known result: Parity requires depth-d circuits of size at least 2^{n^(1/(d-1))}
+        return f"The parity function on {n} variables requires circuit size at least 2^(n^(1/(d-1))) for constant depth-d."
+
+    @staticmethod
+    def monotone_clique_lower_bound(n, k):
+        """
+        Proves that the k-clique function on graphs with n vertices
+        requires monotone circuits of exponential size.
+
+        Parameters:
+        n (int): The number of vertices in the graph.
+        k (int): The size of the clique.
+
+        Returns:
+        str: A statement of the lower bound for monotone circuits computing k-clique.
+        """
+        # Razborov (1985) result: Monotone circuits for k-clique require exponential size
+        return f"Monotone circuits for the {k}-clique function on graphs with {n} vertices require exponential size."
+
+    @staticmethod
+    def circuit_size_lower_bound(function_description):
+        """
+        Given a description of a Boolean function, attempts to apply known
+        lower bound techniques to estimate the size of circuits needed to
+        compute it.
+
+        Parameters:
+        function_description (str): A textual or symbolic description of the Boolean function.
+
+        Returns:
+        str: A lower bound statement, or a message indicating that no known lower bound applies.
+        """
+        # This is just a placeholder for now. In a real implementation,
+        # you might attempt to match the function to known results or
+        # apply structural arguments.
+        return f"Lower bounds for {function_description} are currently not established."
+
+    @staticmethod
+    def topological_obstruction_bounds(n):
+        """
+        Uses topological methods to argue that certain Boolean functions require
+        super-polynomial size circuits.
+
+        Parameters:
+        n (int): The number of input variables.
+
+        Returns:
+        str: A statement about lower bounds derived from topological obstructions.
+        """
+        # Hypothetical: Using topological invariants of the Boolean cube to argue lower bounds
+        return f"Topological arguments suggest that functions with certain invariants require circuits of size at least 2^{sqrt(n)}."
+
+# Example usage
+if __name__ == "__main__":
+    # Example: Parity lower bound
+    print(CircuitLowerBound.parity_lower_bound(10))
+
+    # Example: Monotone clique lower bound
+    print(CircuitLowerBound.monotone_clique_lower_bound(50, 5))
+
+    # Example: Generic lower bound attempt
+    print(CircuitLowerBound.circuit_size_lower_bound("Majority function"))
+
+    # Example: Topological lower bound argument
+    print(CircuitLowerBound.topological_obstruction_bounds(100))

proof_systems.py

@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
+# proof_systems.py
+
+class PropositionalProofSystem:
+    """
+    A class representing a generic propositional proof system.
+    Includes methods to check proof validity, estimate proof size, and
+    explore the relationship between proof length and complexity.
+    """
+    def __init__(self, proof_structure):
+        self.proof_structure = proof_structure
+
+    def is_valid_proof(self, formula):
+        """
+        Verifies whether the given proof proves the formula.
+
+        Parameters:
+        formula (str): A propositional formula in CNF.
+
+        Returns:
+        bool: True if the proof is valid, False otherwise.
+        """
+        # Placeholder logic
+        return "PROOF_OF(" + formula + ")" in self.proof_structure
+
+    def proof_size(self):
+        """
+        Calculates the size of the proof in some normalized units.
+
+        Returns:
+        int: The size of the proof.
+        """
+        return len(self.proof_structure)
+
+    def check_efficiency(self):
+        """
+        Determines if the proof is considered efficient by comparing its size
+        against known lower bounds for propositional tautologies.
+
+        Returns:
+        bool: True if the proof is efficient, False otherwise.
+        """
+        # For demonstration purposes, assume 1000 is the threshold
+        return self.proof_size() < 1000