hot fix ssl details #7
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @vncloudsco, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request significantly refines the application's SSL certificate management capabilities. It streamlines the process of securing domains by introducing an integrated auto-SSL option during domain creation and fortifies manual certificate uploads with robust client-side validation. Additionally, the certificate renewal mechanism has been made more intelligent with eligibility checks, ensuring a smoother and more reliable experience for users managing their domain security. Highlights
Ignored Files
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull Request Overview
This PR introduces SSL certificate enhancements, including support for ZeroSSL alongside Let's Encrypt, improved certificate validation, auto-creation of SSL certificates during domain creation, and renewal eligibility checks. The version is updated from 0.1.3 to 0.1.3.1.
- Added ZeroSSL support alongside Let's Encrypt for SSL certificates
- Implemented client-side SSL certificate validation with PEM format checks and basic security scanning
- Added auto-create SSL certificate option when creating new domains
- Enhanced SSL certificate renewal with 30-day eligibility checks and improved user feedback
Reviewed Changes
Copilot reviewed 8 out of 8 changed files in this pull request and generated 3 comments.
Show a summary per file
| File | Description |
|---|---|
| src/types/index.ts | Added optional daysUntilExpiry field to SSLCertificate interface to support renewal eligibility checks |
| src/components/ssl/SSLDialog.tsx | Updated SSL dialog to support ZeroSSL branding, added certificate validation functions for PEM format and domain matching |
| src/components/pages/SSLTable.tsx | Enhanced renewal flow with eligibility checks based on days until expiry and improved error messaging |
| src/components/pages/Domains.tsx | Passed isLoading prop to DomainDialogV2 to show loading states during domain operations |
| src/components/domains/DomainDialogV2.tsx | Added auto-create SSL certificate option with email input for new domains, implemented loading states for form interactions |
| src-tauri/tauri.conf.json | Updated version to 0.1.3.1 |
| src-tauri/Cargo.toml | Updated version to 0.1.3.1 |
| .github/workflows/build.yml | Updated release workflow to reference version 0.1.3.1 |
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (1)
src/components/ssl/SSLDialog.tsx:146
- Unused variable certLines.
const certLines = certificate.split('\n');
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
| }; | ||
|
|
||
| // Validate domain name matches certificate | ||
| const validateDomainMatch = async (domainName: string, certificate: string): Promise<{ valid: boolean; error?: string }> => { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The function is declared as async but contains no await operations. Remove the async keyword as it's unnecessary and misleading.
| const validateDomainMatch = async (domainName: string, certificate: string): Promise<{ valid: boolean; error?: string }> => { | |
| const validateDomainMatch = (domainName: string, certificate: string): { valid: boolean; error?: string } => { |
| try { | ||
| // Extract CN and SANs from certificate (basic parsing) | ||
| // This is a simplified check - full validation happens on backend | ||
| const certLines = certificate.split('\n'); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The variable certLines is declared but never used. It should be removed to eliminate dead code.
| const certLines = certificate.split('\n'); |
| // Validate domain match | ||
| const selectedDomain = domainsResponse?.data?.find(d => d.id === formData.domainId); | ||
| if (selectedDomain) { | ||
| const domainMatchValidation = await validateDomainMatch(selectedDomain.name, formData.certificate); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The validateDomainMatch function doesn't need to be awaited as it performs only synchronous operations. Since it's incorrectly marked as async, this creates unnecessary overhead. After removing the async keyword from the function, remove the await here.
| const domainMatchValidation = await validateDomainMatch(selectedDomain.name, formData.certificate); | |
| const domainMatchValidation = validateDomainMatch(selectedDomain.name, formData.certificate); |
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request introduces functionality to auto-create SSL certificates when adding a new domain and enhances the SSL management UI. Key additions include client-side validation for certificate formats, improved certificate renewal logic with eligibility checks, and UI feedback for loading states. The changes are well-implemented, but I have a few suggestions to improve code clarity, remove redundancy, and enhance maintainability by avoiding any types and magic numbers.
| // Validate SSL email if auto-create is enabled | ||
| if (data.autoCreateSSL && !data.sslEmail) { | ||
| toast.error('Email is required when auto-creating SSL certificate'); | ||
| return; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This manual validation for sslEmail is redundant because react-hook-form is already configured with a conditional required rule for this field. The form's onSubmit will only be called if all validations pass. You can remove this block to rely solely on react-hook-form for validation, which simplifies the code and avoids duplication of logic.
|
|
||
| // Prepare data in API format | ||
| const domainData = { | ||
| const domainData: any = { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Using any for domainData weakens type safety and reduces maintainability. It would be better to define a proper type for the data payload. Since the payload structure depends on whether you're creating or updating a domain, you could define a more comprehensive local type for domainData that covers all possible properties.
| if (daysUntilExpiry !== undefined && daysUntilExpiry > 30) { | ||
| toast.warning( | ||
| `Certificate is not yet eligible for renewal. It expires in ${daysUntilExpiry} days. Renewal is only allowed when less than 30 days remain.` | ||
| ); | ||
| setRenewingId(null); | ||
| return; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The number 30 is a "magic number" representing the renewal eligibility period in days. It's used here and later in the component for the button's title attribute (line 172). To improve readability and maintainability, it's better to extract this value into a named constant at the top of the component, e.g., const RENEWAL_ELIGIBILITY_DAYS = 30;.
No description provided.