DOCS: Using Processors page was missing a code block ending

[LeoUnity]

Description

The code block was missing the ``` ending, so the paragraphs afterwards were still considered code.

Before:

After:

Testing status & QA

None yet.

Overall Product Risks

• Complexity: 0
• Halo Effect: 0

Comments to reviewers

Please describe any additional information such as what to focus on, or historical info for the reviewers.

Checklist

Before review:

• Changelog entry added.
  • Explains the change in Changed, Fixed, Added sections.
  • For API change contains an example snippet and/or migration example.
  • JIRA ticket linked, example (case %%). If it is a private issue, just add the case ID without a link.
  • Jira port for the next release set as "Resolved".

During merge:

• Commit message for squash-merge is prefixed with one of the list:
  • NEW: ___.
  • FIX: ___.
  • DOCS: ___.
  • CHANGE: ___.
  • RELEASE: 1.1.0-preview.3.

After merge:

• Create forward/backward port if needed. If you are blocked from creating a forward port now please add a task to ISX-1444.

[Pauliusd01]

Does this fix only the top half of the example code? Seems like the bottom is broken as well

[LeoUnity]

Yeah it's supposed to fix exactly that part, this is what it looks for me:

I followed the instructions in https://internaldocs.unity.com/package_development/documentation/#previewing-package-docs to get the preview locally. I'm wondering if I'm doing something different than you...

I also updated the PR description to include the before and after

[Pauliusd01]

I followed the instructions in https://internaldocs.unity.com/package_development/documentation/#previewing-package-docs to get the preview locally. I'm wondering if I'm doing something different than you...

I also updated the PR description to include the before and after

Sorry for the scare, the local doc version failed to build for me so I only peeked at the public one. I fixed the local doc one now, was missing a visual studio component. Looks good to me

[ritamerkl]

Oh wow, how did that happen? Thanks for the fix!

[codecov-github-com]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #2232      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    68.14%   66.53%   -1.62%     
===========================================
  Files          367      376       +9     
  Lines        53685    55042    +1357     
===========================================
+ Hits         36584    36622      +38     
- Misses       17101    18420    +1319     

Flag	Coverage Δ
inputsystem_Windows_2021.3	5.91% <ø> (?)
inputsystem_Windows_6000.0	5.19% <ø> (?)
inputsystem_Windows_6000.2	5.19% <ø> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

see 10 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.