Skip to content

Conversation

korotkov-aerospike
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Oct 16, 2025

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 74.35897% with 10 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 49.70%. Comparing base (c95433a) to head (93b6abf).

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
pkg/dto/backup_policy.go 0.00% 4 Missing and 2 partials ⚠️
pkg/dto/compression_policy.go 62.50% 2 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
pkg/service/restoreexecutor/xdr.go 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##               v3     #438      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   48.95%   49.70%   +0.74%     
==========================================
  Files          79       79              
  Lines        5039     5056      +17     
==========================================
+ Hits         2467     2513      +46     
+ Misses       2376     2341      -35     
- Partials      196      202       +6     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@korotkov-aerospike korotkov-aerospike marked this pull request as ready for review October 16, 2025 09:42
@reugn reugn changed the title APPS-1920 Optional fields in retry policy APPS-1920 Add support for optional fields in retry policy Oct 16, 2025
@korotkov-aerospike korotkov-aerospike merged commit 5ccad9f into v3 Oct 16, 2025
12 of 13 checks passed
@korotkov-aerospike korotkov-aerospike deleted the apps-1920-retry-policy branch October 16, 2025 13:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants