Skip to content

agda-stdlib-utils: allow base-4.22 for GHC 9.14#2984

Open
andreasabel wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
ghc-9.14.1
Open

agda-stdlib-utils: allow base-4.22 for GHC 9.14#2984
andreasabel wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
ghc-9.14.1

Conversation

@andreasabel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@andreasabel andreasabel commented Apr 18, 2026

We need this base relaxation to test Agda under GHC 9.14.

CI passes: https://github.com/agda/agda-stdlib/actions/runs/24605750482/job/71951601541

@andreasabel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

I put this commit onto experimental, which I also updated to latest master.
So it might be better to not merge this PR in the usual way, but fast-forward master to experimental (this of course only work while not other commits have landed on master), or to cherry-pick the commit from experimental.

@JacquesCarette
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

This should definitely target experimental rather than master. Right now, github thinks this targets master ?

@andreasabel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

It is already on experimental. If that is sufficient, the PR can be closed.

@Taneb
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Taneb commented Apr 19, 2026

Personally, I'm OK with this being merged to master. In principle, the version of GHC we use for agda-stdlib-utils need not be the version we used to compile agda

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@MatthewDaggitt MatthewDaggitt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Apart from that looks good!

- master
- experimental
workflow_dispatch:
{}
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What is the purpose of these additions?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You can also run this workflow manually on the "Actions" page. ("Dispatch")
We will likely not need to do so, but this line is autogenerated by HaskellCI. (Like the whole action is.)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants