You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository was archived by the owner on Jan 31, 2022. It is now read-only.
A customer on support reported that ISA's addFacetRefinement used with isDisjunctiveFacet=true does return hits with only the selected facet values.
He's mostly right: the documented parameterfacets is returned with the currently refined facets, while the disjunctive facet values are returned in the undocumented disjunctiveFacets parameters.
Compare with IS-iOS using the swift client, which follows the specification:
I see two potential solutions:
If we consider that having both attributes brings value (and I believe so), we should open the conversation with the other API client maintainers to return both results for disjunctive faceting queries
If we consider this is useless, we should update the client to put disjunctive facets in facets (keeping the disjunctiveFacets attribute for BC until the next major version).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
A customer on support reported that ISA's
addFacetRefinement
used withisDisjunctiveFacet=true
does return hits with only the selected facet values.He's mostly right: the documented parameter
facets
is returned with the currently refined facets, while the disjunctive facet values are returned in the undocumenteddisjunctiveFacets
parameters.Compare with IS-iOS using the swift client, which follows the specification:

I see two potential solutions:
disjunctiveFacets
attribute for BC until the nextmajor
version).The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: