Skip to content

Conversation

@yann-soubeyrand
Copy link

@yann-soubeyrand yann-soubeyrand commented Jun 24, 2023

Head, header and footer reveal.js docinfo, and footer docinfo are already supported. However, header docinfo is not, but may be useful to add a logo for example. It can also confuse users that this is not working like in other AsciiDoc documents (maybe head docinfo should be added as well).

@ggrossetie
Copy link
Member

I would love your opinion on #466
Once we agree on which use cases are supported we can move forward and add the missing docinfo locations.

but may be useful to add a logo for example

The logo will appear on each slides? before the first slide? Could you please provide a simple example?

@yann-soubeyrand
Copy link
Author

Hi @ggrossetie, sorry for the late reply. You can find an example here: https://github.com/camptocamp/asciidoctor-revealjs-template/blob/bf5d7c1cf9a91c6a9eb76a5200ff700270d34a56/docinfo-footer.html#L1-L6. There’s a presentation.html in this repo showing the result. It took me some time to figure out why I couldn’t get my logos when putting them in the docinfo-header.html file and I was surprised to discover that docinfo-footer.html was supported, but not the other docinfo-*.html. I can’t put my logos in docinfo-header-revealjs.html, because their position is wrong in this case.

@yann-soubeyrand
Copy link
Author

yann-soubeyrand commented Jun 28, 2023

As an (unrelated) side note, Font Awesome v6 seems to work with v4 shims: https://github.com/camptocamp/asciidoctor-revealjs-template/blob/example/css/font-awesome.css.

Edit: never mind, I thought I read that asciidoctor-revealjs was blocked on Font Awesome v4, but I may have read it in the asciidoctor issues, or maybe I’m just wrong!

Edit 2: yes, that’s it: asciidoctor/asciidoctor#2535!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants