The tracking results of pyAT and AT are different.

[ascetic0515]

Hi, after I import and generate a Lattice in MATLAB, I copy the ".m" file to pyAT. I've noticed that the parameters obtained from ringpara in MATLAB and get_radiation() in pyAT have slight differences, such as chromaticity differing by one in a thousand, and the working point differing by an even smaller magnitude. Then, when I use Tracking for particle tracking, I find that the particle loss locations in pyAT and MATLAB are inconsistent. I observed that the difference in chromaticity obtained from get_radiation() and get_chrom() is due to one having a default empty energy dispersion value and the other having a default value of 0. However, even after I modified this, the issue still persists. I'm wondering if it's possible for the particle tracking loss locations to be different.