Skip to content

Conversation

@HDValentin
Copy link

Thanks for taking the time to suggest an addition to awesome-selfhosted!

To ensure your pull request is dealt with swiftly, please check the following (check the boxes [x]):

  • Submit one item per pull request. This eases reviewing and speeds up inclusion.
  • You have searched the repository for any relevant issues or PRs, including closed ones.
  • Any software you are adding is not already listed at any of awesome-sysadmin, staticgen.com, staticsitegenerators.bevry.me, dbdb.io.
  • The file you are adding is formatted as described in addition.md.
  • Demo links should only be used for interactive demos, i.e. not video demonstrations. If login credentials are required to access the demo, please link to the credentials directly.
  • Comments and unused optional fields have been removed.
  • The file you are adding uses kebab-case file naming, for example my-awesome-software.yml.
  • Values for platform are the main server-side requirements for the software. Don't include frameworks or specific dialects.
  • Any software project you are adding to the list is actively maintained.
  • Any software project you are adding was first released more than 4 months ago.
  • Any software project you are adding has working installation instructions.
  • You understand that your pull request will be merged ~1 week after approval to allow for further comments if needed.

@Rabenherz112 Rabenherz112 added addition Adding new software to the list reviewers wanted Awaiting reviews labels Aug 10, 2025
HDValentin and others added 3 commits August 11, 2025 22:56
Co-authored-by: kokomo123 <70863536+kokomo123@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: kokomo123 <70863536+kokomo123@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: kokomo123 <70863536+kokomo123@users.noreply.github.com>
Copy link
Collaborator

@kokomo123 kokomo123 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, no problems here pending further thoughts from collaborators. thank you for your contribution!

@nodiscc nodiscc self-requested a review August 16, 2025 09:28
@Rabenherz112
Copy link
Collaborator

@HDValentin ping

@HDValentin
Copy link
Author

HDValentin commented Sep 19, 2025

Is everything done now? @Rabenherz112

kokomo123

This comment was marked as outdated.

@kokomo123 kokomo123 self-requested a review September 20, 2025 17:16
@kokomo123
Copy link
Collaborator

kokomo123 commented Sep 20, 2025

@HDValentin Did you press commit suggested changes on Ki-ers suggestions? Those are still pending, I don't think i see the latest changes yet. Unless there's a reason to deny them?

HDValentin and others added 4 commits September 21, 2025 08:11
Co-authored-by: Kieran <32241933+Ki-er@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Kieran <32241933+Ki-er@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Kieran <32241933+Ki-er@users.noreply.github.com>
@HDValentin
Copy link
Author

HDValentin commented Sep 21, 2025

@HDValentin Did you press commit suggested changes on Ki-ers suggestions? Those are still pending, I don't think i see the latest changes yet. Unless there's a reason to deny them?

Do I have them all now?
Oh I’ve got error messages on syntax checks. It says it was cancelled.

Copy link
Collaborator

@kokomo123 kokomo123 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

As appropriate changes have been made, LGTM pending further thoughts from collaborators. Thank you for your contribution 👍🏻

Comment on lines +7 to +10
platforms:
- Python
- Shell
- deb
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
platforms:
- Python
- Shell
- deb
platforms:
- deb

As far as I can see (https://docs.libre-workspace.org/setup/installation.html) the only available installation methods are based on a pre-built Debian-based ISO images, or using a custom APT repository. I think only deb is relevant

@Rabenherz112
Copy link
Collaborator

No response for over a month, closing..

@Rabenherz112 Rabenherz112 removed the reviewers wanted Awaiting reviews label Oct 25, 2025
@Rabenherz112 Rabenherz112 added the invalid This doesn't seem right label Oct 25, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

addition Adding new software to the list invalid This doesn't seem right

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants