Skip to content

Conversation

@rasulkireev
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for taking the time to suggest an addition to awesome-selfhosted!

To ensure your Pull Request is dealt with swiftly, please check the following (check the boxes [x]):

  • Submit one item per pull request. This eases reviewing and speeds up inclusion.
  • You have searched the repository for any relevant issues or PRs, including closed ones.
  • Any software you are adding is not already listed at any of awesome-sysadmin, staticgen.com, staticsitegenerators.bevry.me, dbdb.io.
  • The file you are adding is formatted as described in addition.md.
  • Demo links should only be used for interactive demos, i.e. not video demonstrations. If login credentials are required to access the demo, please link to the credentials directly.
  • Comments and unused optional fields have been removed.
  • The file you are adding uses kebab-case file naming, for example my-awesome-software.yml.
  • Values for platform are the main server-side requirements for the software. Don't include frameworks or specific dialects.
  • Any software project you are adding to the list is actively maintained.
  • Any software project you are adding was first released more than 4 months ago.
  • Any software project you are adding has working installation instructions.
  • You understand that your Pull Request will be merged ~1 week after approval, to allow for further comments if needed.

@rasulkireev
Copy link
Contributor Author

rasulkireev commented Sep 14, 2025

This is a remake of #1633

I renamed the project and updated deployment options/instructions as per comments in that previous PR. Thought it made sense to create a new PR. Apologies if my assumptions were wrong and should have kept it in the previous one.

@kokomo123 kokomo123 added addition Adding new software to the list reviewers wanted Awaiting reviews labels Sep 14, 2025
kokomo123

This comment was marked as outdated.

@rasulkireev
Copy link
Contributor Author

@kokomo123 thanks for the review

Copy link
Collaborator

@kokomo123 kokomo123 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, as appropriate changes have been made pending further thoughts from collaborators. Thank you 👍🏻

@rasulkireev rasulkireev requested a review from Ki-er September 24, 2025 17:06
Copy link
Collaborator

@Ki-er Ki-er left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Automation is different than automating content creation

Co-authored-by: Kieran <32241933+Ki-er@users.noreply.github.com>
@rasulkireev
Copy link
Contributor Author

@Ki-er make sense about automation. updated

@rasulkireev rasulkireev requested a review from Ki-er September 25, 2025 15:55
@nodiscc nodiscc self-requested a review September 30, 2025 22:40
@rasulkireev
Copy link
Contributor Author

@Ki-er , @nodiscc.

hey guys, no rush on this. just pinging in case this PR got lost in a mountain of PRs.

rasulkireev and others added 2 commits October 7, 2025 10:54
Co-authored-by: nodiscc <nodiscc@gmail.com>
@rasulkireev rasulkireev requested a review from nodiscc October 9, 2025 17:49
@rasulkireev
Copy link
Contributor Author

@nodiscc , if you have time do you mind reviewing? Thanks a ton in advance

@nodiscc nodiscc removed the reviewers wanted Awaiting reviews label Oct 14, 2025
@rasulkireev
Copy link
Contributor Author

Apologies for the stupid question, but what happens now after the reviews are done?

@nodiscc
Copy link
Member

nodiscc commented Oct 17, 2025

You understand that your Pull Request will be merged ~1 week after approval, to allow for further comments if needed.

@Rabenherz112 Rabenherz112 merged commit 7396460 into awesome-selfhosted:master Oct 20, 2025
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

addition Adding new software to the list

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants