Merge pull request #69 from badgateway/release-2

Releasing v2

Author: evert

changelog.md

@@ -1,12 +1,23 @@
 ChangeLog
 =========
 
-2.0.0 (????-??-??)
+2.0.0 (2024-10-02)
 ------------------
 
-* #66: We now convert from/to ArrayBuffer instead of a custom ByteSequence
+The "Structured Field Values" was updated in [RFC9651][rfc9651]. This new
+specification added the ['Date'][9] and ['Display String'][10] field types.
+The former encodes unix timestamp, the latter a Unicode string.
+
+Perfect time to update this package as well! This new major release supports
+the new standard.
+
+* #66: We now convert from/to `ArrayBuffer` instead of a custom ByteSequence
   object. This is a breaking change.
-* Bundling CommonJS for backwards compat.
+* Add support for `Date` and `DisplayString` from RFC9651.
+* Switched to ESM, but we're still bundling a CommonJS build.
+* No longer shipping a minified build.
+* Dropped Chai and now using `node:assert`.
+* Dropped Mocha and now using `node:test`.
 
 
 2.0.0-alpha.1 (2024-02-23)
@@ -63,7 +74,7 @@ ChangeLog
 0.4.0 (2021-05-15)
 ------------------
 
-* Fully up to date with [RFC8941][5].
+* Fully up to date with [RFC8941][rfc8941].
 * This is a complete rewrite, all APIs have changed and return the structures
   that are recommended by the actual RFC document.
 * Passing almost all tests from the [HTTP WG test suite][6]. See the readme for
@@ -125,6 +136,9 @@ ChangeLog
 [2]: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-09
 [3]: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-10
 [4]: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-13
-[5]: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8941
 [6]: https://github.com/httpwg/structured-field-tests
 [7]: https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis-05.html
+[9]: https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9651.html#name-dates
+[10]: https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9651.html#name-display-strings
+[rfc8941]: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8941
+[rfc9651]: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc9651

package.json

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 {
   "name": "structured-headers",
   "version": "2.0.0-alpha.1",
-  "description": "Implementation of RFC8941, structured headers for HTTP.",
+  "description": "Implementation of Structured Field Values for HTTP (RFC9651, RFC8941)",
   "type": "module",
   "exports": {
     "import": "./dist/index.js",
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
     "structured-header",
     "structured-fields",
     "structured fields",
+    "RFC9651",
     "RFC8941",
     "headers"
   ],

readme.md

@@ -1,20 +1,21 @@
 Structured Headers parser for Javascript
 ========================================
 
-This library is a parser and serializer for the [Structured Headers][1]
-specification, a.k.a. "Structured Field Values for HTTP" (RFC8941).
+This library implements a parser and serializer for the [Structured Field Values for HTTP][2]
+specification. ([RFC9651][3], [RFC8941][1]).
 
 This specification defines a standard serialization for complex HTTP header
 values, including lists (arrays), dictionaries (maps) and also numbers,
-booleans, and binary data.
+booleans, binary data, timestamps and Unicode strings.
 
 The library is written in Typescript, and the examples in this document are
-too, but plain Javascript is also fully supported.
+too, but plain Javascript is also fully supported. It ships with ESM and
+CommonJS builds and has 0 dependencies.
 
 Compatibility
 -------------
 
-This package has 2740 unittests, the vast majority are supplied from the
+This package has 2805 unittests, the vast majority are supplied from the
 official [HTTP WG test suite][2].
 
 However, there are 2 differences in the serializer:
@@ -249,3 +250,4 @@ of the api.
 
 [1]: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8941
 [2]: https://github.com/httpwg/structured-field-tests
+[3]: https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9651.html