Skip to content

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Sep 4, 2025

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Confidence
@tiptap/extension-blockquote (source) 3.3.1 -> 3.4.1 age confidence
@tiptap/extension-bold (source) 3.3.1 -> 3.4.1 age confidence
@tiptap/extension-bullet-list (source) 3.3.1 -> 3.4.1 age confidence
@tiptap/extension-code (source) 3.3.1 -> 3.4.1 age confidence
@tiptap/extension-code-block (source) 3.3.1 -> 3.4.1 age confidence
@tiptap/extension-link (source) 3.3.1 -> 3.4.1 age confidence
@tiptap/extension-list-item (source) 3.3.1 -> 3.4.1 age confidence
@tiptap/extension-ordered-list (source) 3.3.1 -> 3.4.1 age confidence
@tiptap/extension-placeholder (source) 3.3.1 -> 3.4.1 age confidence
@tiptap/extension-strike (source) 3.3.1 -> 3.4.1 age confidence
@tiptap/extension-underline (source) 3.3.1 -> 3.4.1 age confidence
@tiptap/react (source) 3.3.1 -> 3.4.1 age confidence
@tiptap/starter-kit (source) 3.3.1 -> 3.4.1 age confidence

Release Notes

ueberdosis/tiptap (@​tiptap/extension-blockquote)

v3.4.1

Compare Source

Releases

@​tiptap/extension-text-style@​3.4.1

Patch Changes
  • 46fa8b8: Prefer the raw inline style attribute when parsing color and
    background-color so the original format (hex, rgba/hsla, etc.) is
    preserved instead of falling back to the computed element.style.*
    value (which often resolves to rgb(...)).

    This fixes mismatches where consumers (for example, demo toolbars and
    color pickers) expected the original hex values when initializing the
    editor from HTML.

    • The color and background-color parsers now look for a style
      attribute first and extract the declared value. If no raw style is
      present, they still fall back to element.style.color /
      element.style.backgroundColor.

    MIGRATION NOTES

    • This is a patch-level change. It corrects parsing behavior and is the
      least-disruptive fix for the issue.
    • If your code relied on the parser returning computed rgb(...)
      strings, you may see different string values (for example #​958DF1
      instead of rgb(149, 141, 241)) when HTML contained hex values.
    • If you need a stable, normalized format for comparisons, normalize the
      attribute (for example with a color utility like tinycolor2) before
      comparing or use the editor APIs in a way that doesn't depend on the
      exact string representation.
    • @​tiptap/core@​3.4.1

@​tiptap/react@​3.4.1

Patch Changes

@​tiptap/suggestion@​3.4.1

Patch Changes
  • 59fb86f: Previously, clientRect was only obtained through decorationNode. If decorationNode could not be obtained, clientRect was set to null, which caused the suggestion not to render in some IME scenarios (notably Chinese IME).

    This change adds a fallback method to compute clientRect from the editor's cursor position when decorationNode is not available. It generates a DOMRect based on the cursor coordinates so the suggestion can render even when the decoration node is missing.

v3.4.0

Compare Source

Patch Changes

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about these updates again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/tiptap-monorepo branch from be56143 to 7f012e7 Compare September 4, 2025 14:13
@renovate renovate bot changed the title fix(deps): update tiptap monorepo to v3.4.0 fix(deps): update tiptap monorepo to v3.4.1 Sep 4, 2025
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Sep 4, 2025

@junminahn junminahn merged commit b07f202 into main Sep 5, 2025
10 of 11 checks passed
@junminahn junminahn deleted the renovate/tiptap-monorepo branch September 5, 2025 05:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant